Literature DB >> 17087579

Implicit task sets in task switching?

Gesine Dreisbach1, Thomas Goschke, Hilde Haider.   

Abstract

In 2 experiments, the authors compare stimulus-based versus task-rule-based task performance. Participants practiced 8 stimulus-response mappings either with or without knowledge about 2 underlying task sets. After practice, 2 transfer blocks with 8 new stimuli were presented. Results show that rule knowledge leads to significant switch and transfer costs, whereas without rule knowledge neither switch nor transfer costs occur. However, significant Task Type x Response Type interactions occurred in both conditions. In a second experiment including only the no rule condition, half of the stimulus-response mappings in the transfer blocks were incongruent to the underlying task rule. Slower response times for these incongruent stimuli as compared with congruent stimuli and the absence of switch costs suggest that participants acquired (presumably implicit) knowledge about 4 different stimulus-response categories. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17087579     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  14 in total

1.  Is the relationship of prosaccade reaction times and antisaccade errors mediated by working memory?

Authors:  Trevor J Crawford; Elisabeth Parker; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Jenny Mayes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): a theoretical framework for task switching.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Yoav Kessler; Esther Adi-Japha
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-03-19

3.  A tweaking principle for executive control: neuronal circuit mechanism for rule-based task switching and conflict resolution.

Authors:  Salva Ardid; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The role of saccades in multitasking: towards an output-related view of eye movements.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-01

5.  Evidence for instructions-based updating of task-set representations: the informed fadeout effect.

Authors:  Maayan Pereg; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-02-16

6.  "Optimal suppression" as a solution to the paradoxical cost of multitasking: examination of suppression specificity in task switching.

Authors:  Maayan Katzir; Bnaya Ori; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-10-27

7.  Speaking Two Languages for the Price of One: Bypassing Language Control Mechanisms via Accessibility-Driven Switches.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-03-25

8.  Switch-task performance in rats is disturbed by 12 h of sleep deprivation but not by 12 h of sleep fragmentation.

Authors:  Cathalijn H C Leenaars; Ruud N J M A Joosten; Allard Zwart; Hans Sandberg; Emma Ruimschotel; Maaike A J Hanegraaf; Maurice Dematteis; Matthijs G P Feenstra; Eus J W van Someren
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  The perceptual effects of learning object categories that predict perceptual goals.

Authors:  Ana E Van Gulick; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Modelling response selection in task switching: testing the contingent encoding assumption.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.