Literature DB >> 24820671

The perceptual effects of learning object categories that predict perceptual goals.

Ana E Van Gulick1, Isabel Gauthier1.   

Abstract

In classic category learning studies, subjects typically learn to assign items to 1 of 2 categories, with no further distinction between how items on each side of the category boundary should be treated. In real life, however, we often learn categories that dictate further processing goals, for instance, with objects in only 1 category requiring further individuation. Using methods from category learning and perceptual expertise, we studied the perceptual consequences of experience with objects in tasks that rely on attention to different dimensions in different parts of the space. In 2 experiments, subjects first learned to categorize complex objects from a single morphspace into 2 categories based on 1 morph dimension, and then learned to perform a different task, either naming or a local feature judgment, for each of the 2 categories. A same-different discrimination test before and after each training measured sensitivity to feature dimensions of the space. After initial categorization, sensitivity increased along the category-diagnostic dimension. After task association, sensitivity increased more for the category that was named, especially along the nondiagnostic dimension. The results demonstrate that local attentional weights, associated with individual exemplars as a function of task requirements, can have lasting effects on perceptual representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24820671      PMCID: PMC4143460          DOI: 10.1037/a0036822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  49 in total

1.  Task-irrelevant perceptual expertise.

Authors:  Yetta K Wong; Jonathan R Folstein; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  A reevaluation of the electrophysiological correlates of expert object processing.

Authors:  Lisa S Scott; James W Tanaka; David L Sheinberg; Tim Curran
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Letter processing in the visual system: different activation patterns for single letters and strings.

Authors:  Karin H James; Thomas W James; Gael Jobard; Alan C N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Late experience alters vision.

Authors:  T A Polk; M J Farah
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Training experts: individuation without naming is worth it.

Authors:  Cindy M Bukach; Timothy J Vickery; Daniel Kinka; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  How category learning affects object representations: not all morphspaces stretch alike.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Isabel Gauthier; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Thomas Goschke; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-01-06
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Adam T Tierney; Giada Guerra; Aeron Laffere; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Training set coherence and set size effects on concept generalization and recognition.

Authors:  Caitlin R Bowman; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Category Learning Stretches Neural Representations in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan Folstein; Thomas J Palmeri; Ana E Van Gulick; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-02

4.  Holistic processing from learned attention to parts.

Authors:  Kao-Wei Chua; Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-03-16

5.  Perceptual advantage for category-relevant perceptual dimensions: the case of shape and motion.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Category learning can alter perception and its neural correlates.

Authors:  Fernanda Pérez-Gay Juárez; Tomy Sicotte; Christian Thériault; Stevan Harnad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Adaptation aftereffects reveal how categorization training changes the encoding of face identity.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Karla Escobar; Jefferson Salan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.