Literature DB >> 17079552

Primary care physicians' attitudes regarding follow-up care for children with positive newborn screening results.

Alex R Kemper1, Rebecca L Uren, Kathryn L Moseley, Sarah J Clark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although primary care physicians are responsible for providing follow-up care after a positive newborn screen, little is known about their willingness or ability to do so.
METHODS: A national mail survey of a random sample of 350 general pediatricians and 350 family physicians was conducted from April to June 2006.
RESULTS: The response rate was 63% among pediatricians and 50% among family physicians. Most pediatricians (89.7%) and nearly one half of family physicians (44.1%) had had a patient with a positive newborn screen within the past 5 years. Most respondents thought that primary care physicians should be responsible for informing families about a positive newborn screen (73.2%), arranging confirmatory testing (66.0%), and coordinating subspecialty referral (85.3%). However, more than one half (56.2%) would prefer newborn screening programs to provide the initial evaluation of positive newborn screening results. Some respondents (but fewer pediatricians than family physicians) reported that they were not competent to discuss conditions included in newborn screening panels (eg, 22.6% of pediatricians and 53.2% of family physicians for phenylketonuria and 8.8% of pediatricians and 40.4% of family physicians for congenital hypothyroidism). More than one half (58.3%) thought that families with a child diagnosed as having congenital hypothyroidism should receive formal genetic counseling. Respondents were less likely to think that families with a child with sickle cell trait, compared with families with a child who is a cystic fibrosis carrier, should receive formal genetic counseling (69.3% vs 84.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Many primary care physicians are not prepared to manage the follow-up care of children with a positive newborn screen, including initial counseling, diagnosis, and subspecialty referral. New strategies are needed to ensure appropriate and equitable health care delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17079552     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-1639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  23 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the effects of disclosing carrier results generated through newborn screening.

Authors:  R Z Hayeems; J P Bytautas; F A Miller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Primary care role in expanded newborn screening: After the heel prick test.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; June C Carroll; Julian Little; Judith Allanson; Jessica P Bytautas; Pranesh Chakraborty; Brenda J Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Providers' Perspectives on Treating Patients With Thalassemia.

Authors:  Taylor Radke; Susan Paulukonis; Mary M Hulihan; Lisa Feuchtbaum
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.289

4.  Supporting family adaptation to presymptomatic and "untreatable" conditions in an era of expanded newborn screening.

Authors:  Donald B Bailey; F Daniel Armstrong; Alex R Kemper; Debra Skinner; Steven F Warren
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-03-30

5.  Health Care Provider Mobility Counseling Provision to Older Adults: A Rural/Urban Comparison.

Authors:  Andrea L Huseth-Zosel; Gregory Sanders; Melissa O'Connor; Heather Fuller-Iglesias; Linda Langley
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-02

6.  Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Sarah Patton; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann; June C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Parental permission for pilot newborn screening research: guidelines from the NBSTRN.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Michelle Huckaby Lewis; Michael S Watson; Kathryn J Swoboda; Rebecca Anderson; Susan A Berry; Natasha Bonhomme; Jeffrey P Brosco; Anne M Comeau; Aaron Goldenberg; Edward Goldman; Bradford Therrell; Jill Levy-Fisch; Beth Tarini; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Who counsels parents of newborns who are carriers of sickle cell anemia or cystic fibrosis?

Authors:  Kathryn L Moseley; Samya Z Nasr; Jane L Schuette; Andrew D Campbell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: Role of primary care providers in caring for infants with positive screening results.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Carolyn J Barg; Yvonne Bombard; Pranesh Chakraborty; Beth K Potter; Jessica Peace Bytautas; Karen Tam; Louise Taylor; Elizabeth Kerr; Christine Davies; Jennifer Milburn; Felix Ratjen; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Maternal knowledge and attitudes about newborn screening for sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Colleen Walsh Lang; Alex P Stark; Kruti Acharya; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.