Literature DB >> 17070707

Imaging correlates of motor recovery from cerebral infarction and their physiological significance in well-recovered patients.

Dinesh G Nair1, Siobhan Hutchinson, Felipe Fregni, Michael Alexander, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Gottfried Schlaug.   

Abstract

We studied motor representation in well-recovered stroke patients. Eighteen right-handed stroke patients and eleven age-matched control subjects underwent functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) while performing unimanual index finger (abduction-adduction) and wrist movements (flexion-extension) using their recovered and non-affected hand. A subset of these patients underwent Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEP) in the first dorsal interosseous muscle of both hands. Imaging results suggest that good recovery utilizes both ipsi- and contralesional resources, although results differ for wrist and index finger movements. Wrist movements of the recovered arm resulted in significantly greater activation of the contralateral (lesional) and ipsilateral (contralesional) primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1), while comparing patients to control subjects performing the same task. In contrast, recovered index finger movements recruited a larger motor network, including the contralateral SM1, Supplementary Motor Area (SMA) and cerebellum when patients were compared to control subjects. TMS of the lesional hemisphere but not of the contralesional hemisphere induced MEPs in the recovered hand. TMS parameters also revealed greater transcallosal inhibition, from the contralesional to the lesional hemisphere than in the reverse direction. Disinhibition of the contralesional hemisphere observed in a subgroup of our patients suggests persistent alterations in intracortical and transcallosal (interhemispheric) interactions, despite complete functional recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17070707      PMCID: PMC2577311          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  58 in total

1.  Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke: a longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm.

Authors:  C Calautti; F Leroy; J Y Guincestre; J C Baron
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke.

Authors:  Heidi Johansen-Berg; Matthew F S Rushworth; Marko D Bogdanovic; Udo Kischka; Sunil Wimalaratna; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements.

Authors:  M Kobayashi; S Hutchinson; H Théoret; G Schlaug; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 44.182

5.  Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bradley W Vines; Dinesh G Nair; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Friedhelm Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Nagako Murase; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  S C Cramer; G Nelles; R R Benson; J D Kaplan; R A Parker; K K Kwong; D N Kennedy; S P Finklestein; B R Rosen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Motor impairment and recovery in the upper limb after stroke: behavioral and neuroanatomical correlates.

Authors:  Leeanne M Carey; David F Abbott; Gary F Egan; Julie Bernhardt; Geoffrey A Donnan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Functional MRI detects posterior shifts in primary sensorimotor cortex activation after stroke: evidence of local adaptive reorganization?

Authors:  R Pineiro; S Pendlebury; H Johansen-Berg; P M Matthews
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Reorganization of the human ipsilesional premotor cortex after stroke.

Authors:  Esteban A Fridman; Takashi Hanakawa; Melissa Chung; Friedhelm Hummel; Ramon C Leiguarda; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  42 in total

1.  Frontoparietal involvement in passively guided shape and length discrimination: a comparison between subcortical stroke patients and healthy controls.

Authors:  Ann Van de Winckel; Nicole Wenderoth; Willy De Weerdt; Stefan Sunaert; Ron Peeters; Wim Van Hecke; Vincent Thijs; Stephan P Swinnen; Carlo Perfetti; Hilde Feys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

3.  Differential effect of conditioning sequences in coupling inhibitory/facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke motor recovery.

Authors:  Chih-Pin Wang; Po-Yi Tsai; Tsui Fen Yang; Kuang-Yao Yang; Chien-Chih Wang
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 4.  Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  Changes in callosal motor fiber integrity after subcortical stroke of the pyramidal tract.

Authors:  Basia A Radlinska; Yasmin Blunk; Ilana R Leppert; Jeffrey Minuk; G Bruce Pike; Alexander Thiel
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS.

Authors:  Dinesh G Nair; Vijay Renga; Robert Lindenberg; Lin Zhu; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 7.  Biomarkers of recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Milot; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.710

8.  Deficient intracortical inhibition (SICI) during movement preparation after chronic stroke.

Authors:  F C Hummel; B Steven; J Hoppe; K Heise; G Thomalla; L G Cohen; C Gerloff
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  The role of the unaffected hemisphere in motor recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Axel Riecker; Klaus Gröschel; Hermann Ackermann; Sonja Schnaudigel; Jan Kassubek; Andreas Kastrup
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Structural damage to the corticospinal tract correlates with bilateral sensorimotor cortex reorganization in stroke patients.

Authors:  Judith D Schaechter; Katherine L Perdue; Ruopeng Wang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.