Literature DB >> 20091792

The role of the unaffected hemisphere in motor recovery after stroke.

Axel Riecker1, Klaus Gröschel, Hermann Ackermann, Sonja Schnaudigel, Jan Kassubek, Andreas Kastrup.   

Abstract

The contribution of the ipsilateral (nonaffected) hemisphere to recovery of motor function after stroke is controversial. Under the assumption that functionally relevant areas within the ipsilateral motor system should be tightly coupled to the demand we used fMRI and acoustically paced movements of the right index finger at six different frequencies to define the role of these regions for recovery after stroke. Eight well-recovered patients with a chronic striatocapsular infarction of the left hemisphere were compared with eight age-matched participants. As expected the hemodynamic response increased linearly with the frequency of the finger movements at the level of the left supplementary motor cortex (SMA) and the left primary sensorimotor cortex (SMC) in both groups. In contrast, a linear increase of the hemodynamic response with higher tapping frequencies in the right premotor cortex (PMC) and the right SMC was only seen in the patient group. These results support the model of an enhanced bihemispheric recruitment of preexisting motor representations in patients after subcortical stroke. Since all patients had excellent motor recovery contralesional SMC activation appears to be efficient and resembles the widespread, bilateral activation observed in healthy participants performing complex movements, instead of reflecting maladaptive plasticity. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20091792      PMCID: PMC6870650          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  42 in total

1.  The elusive concept of brain connectivity.

Authors:  Barry Horwitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Ipsilateral motor cortex activity during unimanual hand movements relates to task complexity.

Authors:  Timothy Verstynen; Jörn Diedrichsen; Neil Albert; Paul Aparicio; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion.

Authors:  Martin Lotze; Jochen Markert; Paul Sauseng; Julia Hoppe; Christian Plewnia; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Complexity affects regional cerebral blood flow change during sequential finger movements.

Authors:  N Sadato; G Campbell; V Ibáñez; M Deiber; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Nick S Ward; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2004-12

6.  Effect of side and rate of stimulation on cerebral blood flow changes in motor areas during finger movements in humans.

Authors:  U Sabatini; F Chollet; O Rascol; P Celsis; A Rascol; G L Lenzi; J P Marc-Vergnes
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Altered hemodynamic responses in patients after subcortical stroke measured by functional MRI.

Authors:  R Pineiro; S Pendlebury; H Johansen-Berg; P M Matthews
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts.

Authors:  Isabelle Loubinoux; Christophe Carel; Jérémie Pariente; Sophie Dechaumont; Jean-François Albucher; Philippe Marque; Claude Manelfe; François Chollet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study.

Authors:  N S Ward; M M Brown; A J Thompson; R S J Frackowiak
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The relationship between motor deficit and hemisphere activation balance after stroke: A 3T fMRI study.

Authors:  Cinzia Calautti; Marcello Naccarato; Peter S Jones; Nikhil Sharma; Diana D Day; Adrian T Carpenter; Edward T Bullmore; Elizabeth A Warburton; Jean-Claude Baron
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  39 in total

1.  Dynamic brain structural changes after left hemisphere subcortical stroke.

Authors:  Fengmei Fan; Chaozhe Zhu; Hai Chen; Wen Qin; Xunming Ji; Liang Wang; Yujin Zhang; Litao Zhu; Chunshui Yu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Andre G Machado; Adriana B Conforto; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Nicole M Varnerin; Xiaofeng Wang; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Brain networks in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Martijn P van den Heuvel; Alex Fornito
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Ensemble average propagator-based detection of microstructural alterations after stroke.

Authors:  Lorenza Brusini; Silvia Obertino; Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo; Mauro Zucchelli; Gunnar Krueger; Cristina Granziera; Gloria Menegaz
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Cortical and spinal excitability changes after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined to physiotherapy in stroke spastic patients.

Authors:  Rebeka Borba Costa Dos Santos; Silvana Carla Barros Galvão; Labibe Mara Pinel Frederico; Nathália Serrano Lucena Amaral; Maíra Izzadora Souza Carneiro; Alberto Galvão de Moura Filho; Daniele Piscitelli; Kátia Monte-Silva
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Ipsilateral primary motor cortex and behavioral compensation after stroke: a case series study.

Authors:  Ali Bani-Ahmed; Carmen M Cirstea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Shaping plasticity to enhance recovery after injury.

Authors:  Numa Dancause; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 8.  Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Erik H Hoyer; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Remote brain network changes after unilateral cortical impact injury and their modulation by acetylcholinesterase inhibition.

Authors:  Daniel P Holschneider; Yumei Guo; Zhuo Wang; Margareth Roch; Oscar U Scremin
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Frontal and frontoparietal injury differentially affect the ipsilateral corticospinal projection from the nonlesioned hemisphere in monkey (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  R J Morecraft; J Ge; K S Stilwell-Morecraft; D W McNeal; S M Hynes; M A Pizzimenti; D L Rotella; W G Darling
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.