Literature DB >> 17068806

Uncertainty in BRCA1 cancer susceptibility testing.

Bonnie J Baty1, William N Dudley, Adrian Musters, Anita Y Kinney.   

Abstract

This study investigated uncertainty in individuals undergoing genetic counseling/testing for breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility. Sixty-three individuals from a single kindred with a known BRCA1 mutation rated uncertainty about 12 items on a five-point Likert scale before and 1 month after genetic counseling/testing. Factor analysis identified a five-item total uncertainty scale that was sensitive to changes before and after testing. The items in the scale were related to uncertainty about obtaining health care, positive changes after testing, and coping well with results. The majority of participants (76%) rated reducing uncertainty as an important reason for genetic testing. The importance of reducing uncertainty was stable across time and unrelated to anxiety or demographics. Yet, at baseline, total uncertainty was low and decreased after genetic counseling/testing (P = 0.004). Analysis of individual items showed that after genetic counseling/testing, there was less uncertainty about the participant detecting cancer early (P = 0.005) and coping well with their result (P < 0.001). Our findings support the importance to clients of genetic counseling/testing as a means of reducing uncertainty. Testing may help clients to reduce the uncertainty about items they can control, and it may be important to differentiate the sources of uncertainty that are more or less controllable. Genetic counselors can help clients by providing anticipatory guidance about the role of uncertainty in genetic testing. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17068806     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  8 in total

1.  The role of distress in uptake and response to predisposition genetic testing: the BMPR2 experience.

Authors:  Diana L Jones; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-11-15

2.  Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mary Kathleen Ladd; Beth N Peshkin; Leigha Senter; Shari Baldinger; Claudine Isaacs; Hannah Segal; Samantha Philip; Chloe Phillips; Kate Shane; Aimee Martin; Veronique Weinstein; Robert Pilarski; Joanne Jeter; Kevin Sweet; Bonnie Hatten; Elisabeth J Wurtmann; Shanda Phippen; Della Bro; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Effect of genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in African American women: a randomized trial.

Authors:  C H Halbert; L Kessler; A B Troxel; J E Stopfer; S Domchek
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Factors associated with perceived uncertainty among parents of children with undiagnosed medical conditions.

Authors:  Anne C Madeo; Kathleen E O'Brien; Barbara A Bernhardt; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Parental attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions about genetic testing for FAP and colorectal cancer surveillance in minors.

Authors:  Fallon R Levine; James E Coxworth; David A Stevenson; Thérèse Tuohy; Randall W Burt; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  A prospective, longitudinal study of the impact of GJB2/GJB6 genetic testing on the beliefs and attitudes of parents of deaf and hard-of-hearing infants.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Ariadna Martinez; Michelle Fox; Jin Zhou; Nina Shapiro; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne W Grody; Lisa A Schimmenti
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Illustrating Cancer Risk: Patient Risk Communication Preferences and Interest regarding a Novel BRCA1/2 Genetic Risk Modifier Test.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Margaux Genoff Garzon; Ibrahim H Shah; Kechna Cadet; Elyse Shuk; Joy S Westerman; Jennifer L Hay; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  "What does it mean?": uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Marian Reiff; Barbara A Bernhardt; Surabhi Mulchandani; Danielle Soucier; Diana Cornell; Reed E Pyeritz; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 8.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.