Literature DB >> 32191943

Illustrating Cancer Risk: Patient Risk Communication Preferences and Interest regarding a Novel BRCA1/2 Genetic Risk Modifier Test.

Jada G Hamilton1,2,3, Margaux Genoff Garzon4, Ibrahim H Shah4, Kechna Cadet4, Elyse Shuk4, Joy S Westerman4, Jennifer L Hay4,5, Kenneth Offit6,7,8, Mark E Robson6,7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Genetic risk modifier testing (GRMT), an emerging form of genetic testing based on common single nucleotide polymorphisms and polygenic risk scores, has the potential to refine estimates of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers' breast cancer risks. However, for women to benefit from GRMT, effective approaches for communicating this novel risk information are needed.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient preferences regarding risk communication materials for GRMT.
METHODS: We developed four separate presentations (panel of genes, icon array, verbal risk estimate, graphical risk estimate) of hypothetical GRMT results, each using varying risk communication strategies to convey different information elements including number of risk modifier variants present, variant prevalence among BRCA1/2 carriers, and implications and uncertainties of test results for cancer risk. Thirty BRCA1/2 carriers evaluated these materials (randomized to low, moderate, or high breast cancer risk versions). Qualitative and quantitative data were obtained through in-person interviews.
RESULTS: Across risk versions, participants preferred the presentation of the graphical risk estimate, often in combination with the verbal risk estimate. Interest in GRMT was high; 76.7% of participants wanted their own GRMT. Participants valued the potential for GRMT to clarify their cancer susceptibility and provide actionable information. Many (65.5%) anticipated that GRMT would make risk management decisions easier.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with BRCA1/2 mutations could be highly receptive to GRMT, and the minimal amount of necessary information to be included in result risk communication materials includes graphical and verbal estimates of future cancer risk. Findings will inform clinical translation of GRMT in a manner consistent with patients' preferences.
© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic testing; Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; Polygenic risk score; Qualitative methods; Risk communication

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32191943      PMCID: PMC7272266          DOI: 10.1159/000505854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  56 in total

Review 1.  What are effective strategies to communicate cardiovascular risk information to patients? A systematic review.

Authors:  Cherry-Ann Waldron; Trudy van der Weijden; Sabine Ludt; John Gallacher; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-05-14

2.  Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect?

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Mirta Galesic; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Uncertainty in BRCA1 cancer susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Bonnie J Baty; William N Dudley; Adrian Musters; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

4.  Tolerance for uncertainty and perceived risk among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Tiffani DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Sarah Rogers; Jessica Rispoli; Karen Brown; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

5.  Improving communication of breast cancer recurrence risk.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Alice R Richman; Jessica T DeFrank; Valerie F Reyna; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Joan L Bottorff; Patricia Rodney
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-10-27

Review 7.  Visualizing uncertainty about the future.

Authors:  David Spiegelhalter; Mike Pearson; Ian Short
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Perception of screening and risk reduction surgeries in patients tested for a BRCA deleterious mutation.

Authors:  Jennifer K Litton; Shannon N Westin; Kaylene Ready; Charlotte C Sun; Susan K Peterson; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Diane C Bodurka; Karen H Lu; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Banu K Arun
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The Angelina effect: immediate reach, grasp, and impact of going public.

Authors:  Dina L G Borzekowski; Yue Guan; Katherine C Smith; Lori H Erby; Debra L Roter
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Women's constructions of the 'right time' to consider decisions about risk-reducing mastectomy and risk-reducing oophorectomy.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Joan L Bottorff; Lynda G Balneaves; Charmaine Kim-Sing
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.809

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictors of Population Awareness of Cancer Genetic Tests: Implications for Enhancing Equity in Engaging in Cancer Prevention and Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Veda N Giri; Ayako Shimada; Amy E Leader
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-11-03

2.  Understanding the Return of Genomic Sequencing Results Process: Content Review of Participant Summary Letters in the eMERGE Research Network.

Authors:  John A Lynch; Richard R Sharp; Sharon A Aufox; Sarah T Bland; Carrie Blout; Deborah J Bowen; Adam H Buchanan; Colin Halverson; Margaret Harr; Scott J Hebbring; Nora Henrikson; Christin Hoell; Ingrid A Holm; Gail Jarvik; Iftikhar J Kullo; David C Kochan; Eric B Larson; Amanda Lazzeri; Kathleen A Leppig; Jill Madden; Maddalena Marasa; Melanie F Myers; Josh Peterson; Cynthia A Prows; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; James Ralston; Hila Milo Rasouly; Aaron Scrol; Maureen E Smith; Amy Sturm; Kelsey Stuttgen; Georgia Wiesner; Marc S Williams; Julia Wynn; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-05-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.