Literature DB >> 17068699

Femoral head diameter affects the revision rate in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 1,720 hip replacements with 9-21 years of follow-up.

Sarunas Tarasevicius1, Uldis Kesteris, Otto Robertsson, Hans Wingstrand.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a previous study concerning 1,660 ScanHip THAs that were followed for up to 12 years, the cumulative revision rate was not found to be dependent on whether a 22-mm or a 32-mm head size had been used. We have re-examined these patients to see whether a longer follow-up time (9-21 years) would disclose an effect of head size on the revision rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the cumulative revision rate for 1,720 Scan Hip arthroplasties with either 22-mm or 32-mm femoral heads. The patients were followed for 9-21 years.
RESULTS: Arthroplasties with 32-mm head had 2.8-times higher cumulative revision rate than those with a 22-mm head. Older age reduced the risk of revision while male sex increased the risk.
INTERPRETATION: We found that head size affects revision risk, but that even in a reasonably large material a long follow-up time is required to disclose the effects of head size--and thus wear--on survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17068699     DOI: 10.1080/17453670610012872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  12 in total

1.  Dual mobility cups for preventing early hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients at risk: experience in a county hospital.

Authors:  Sebastian S Mukka; Sarwar S Mahmood; Göran O Sjödén; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-06-11

2.  Efficacy of revision surgery for the dislocating total hip arthroplasty: report from a large community registry.

Authors:  Tiare Salassa; Daniel Hoeffel; Susan Mehle; Penny Tatman; Terence J Gioe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Implant wear and aseptic loosening. An overview].

Authors:  C Kaddick; I Catelas; P H Pennekamp; M A Wimmer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Less wear with aluminium-oxide heads than cobalt-chrome heads with ultra high molecular weight cemented polyethylene cups: a ten-year follow-up with radiostereometry.

Authors:  Jon Dahl; Per Söderlund; Bo Nivbrant; Lars Nordsletten; Stephan M Röhrl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Hip resurfacing for rheumatoid arthritis: independent assessment of 11-year results from an international register.

Authors:  Tajeshwar S Aulakh; Jan H Kuiper; Josh Dixey; James B Richardson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation rate after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Sarunas Tarasevicius; Mantas Busevicius; Otto Robertsson; Hans Wingstrand
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  The Ganz acetabular reinforcement ring shows excellent long-term results when used as a primary implant: a retrospective analysis of two hundred and forty primary total hip arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of twenty years.

Authors:  Marc C Attinger; Pascal C Haefeli; Henrik C Bäcker; Remy Flueckiger; Peter M Ballmer; Klaus A Siebenrock; Frank M Klenke
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Dutch guideline on total hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Bart A Swierstra; Anton M J S Vervest; Geert H I M Walenkamp; B Wim Schreurs; Pieter T J Spierings; Ide C Heyligers; Job L C van Susante; Harmen B Ettema; Mariette J Jansen; Pim J Hennis; Janneke de Vries; Sabrina B Muller-Ploeger; Margreet A Pols
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Influence of head size on the development of metallic wear and on the characteristics of carbon layers in metal-on-metal hip joints.

Authors:  Volker Braunstein; Christoph M Sprecher; Markus A Wimmer; Stefan Milz; Georg Taeger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julian Jz Prokopetz; Elena Losina; Robin L Bliss; John Wright; John A Baron; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.