Literature DB >> 17068365

Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations.

Tommy Knöös1, Elinore Wieslander, Luca Cozzi, Carsten Brink, Antonella Fogliata, Dirk Albers, Håkan Nyström, Søren Lassen.   

Abstract

A study of the performance of five commercial radiotherapy treatment planning systems (TPSs) for common treatment sites regarding their ability to model heterogeneities and scattered photons has been performed. The comparison was based on CT information for prostate, head and neck, breast and lung cancer cases. The TPSs were installed locally at different institutions and commissioned for clinical use based on local procedures. For the evaluation, beam qualities as identical as possible were used: low energy (6 MV) and high energy (15 or 18 MV) x-rays. All relevant anatomical structures were outlined and simple treatment plans were set up. Images, structures and plans were exported, anonymized and distributed to the participating institutions using the DICOM protocol. The plans were then re-calculated locally and exported back for evaluation. The TPSs cover dose calculation techniques from correction-based equivalent path length algorithms to model-based algorithms. These were divided into two groups based on how changes in electron transport are accounted for ((a) not considered and (b) considered). Increasing the complexity from the relatively homogeneous pelvic region to the very inhomogeneous lung region resulted in less accurate dose distributions. Improvements in the calculated dose have been shown when models consider volume scatter and changes in electron transport, especially when the extension of the irradiated volume was limited and when low densities were present in or adjacent to the fields. A Monte Carlo calculated algorithm input data set and a benchmark set for a virtual linear accelerator have been produced which have facilitated the analysis and interpretation of the results. The more sophisticated models in the type b group exhibit changes in both absorbed dose and its distribution which are congruent with the simulations performed by Monte Carlo-based virtual accelerator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17068365     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/22/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  77 in total

1.  How to compare treatment plans? Personalized perspective.

Authors:  Tomasz Piotrowski; Agata Jodda
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-07-15

2.  Impact of dose calculation models on radiotherapy outcomes and quality adjusted life years for lung cancer treatment: do we need to measure radiotherapy outcomes to tune the radiobiological parameters of a normal tissue complication probability model?

Authors:  Abdulhamid Chaikh; Nicolas Docquière; Pierre-Yves Bondiau; Jacques Balosso
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12

3.  Statistic and dosimetric criteria to assess the shift of the prescribed dose for lung radiotherapy plans when integrating point kernel models in medical physics: are we ready?

Authors:  Abdulhamid Chaikh; Jacques Balosso
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12

4.  Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Richard A Popple; Geoffrey S Ibbott; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Impact of dose calculation algorithm on radiation therapy.

Authors:  Wen-Zhou Chen; Ying Xiao; Jun Li
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28

6.  Dosimetric verification using monte carlo calculations for tissue heterogeneity-corrected conformal treatment plans following RTOG 0813 dosimetric criteria for lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jun Li; James Galvin; Amy Harrison; Robert Timmerman; Yan Yu; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Automated algorithm for CBCT-based dose calculations of prostate radiotherapy with bilateral hip prostheses.

Authors:  Turki Almatani; Richard P Hugtenburg; Ryan D Lewis; Susan E Barley; Mark A Edwards
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Pencil Beam Algorithms Are Unsuitable for Proton Dose Calculations in Lung.

Authors:  Paige A Taylor; Stephen F Kry; David S Followill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  The accuracy of treatment planning system dose modelling in the presence of brass mesh bolus.

Authors:  Neil Richmond
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-07-22

10.  Dose Specification for NRG Radiation Therapy Trials.

Authors:  David J Gladstone; Stephen F Kry; Ying Xiao; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.