Literature DB >> 17068125

Nonlinear auditory mechanism enhances female sounds for male mosquitoes.

Joseph C Jackson1, Daniel Robert.   

Abstract

Sound plays an important role in the life history of mosquitoes. Male mosquitoes detect females by the sound generated by their wingbeat. Because female wings are weak acoustic radiators, males have been driven by sexual selection to evolve sensitive acoustic sensors. Mosquito antennae are very sensitive acoustic receivers, featuring up to 16,000 sensory cells, a number comparable with that contained in the human cochlea. The antennal sound receiver exhibits frequency selectivity, input amplification, and self-generated oscillations, features that parallel the functional sophistication of the cochlear amplifier. Although arguably the male antenna is well suited to receiving weak female sounds, the role of active mechanisms in mosquito hearing is far from understood. Previous mechanical studies on mosquito hearing largely focused on the steady-state antennal response to harmonic sounds, mostly evaluating the data through conventional Fourier transforms. Here, we report on the time-resolved mechanical behavior of the male antenna in response to female sounds. Crucially, stimuli were designed to reflect the temporal acoustic profile of a female flying by. With these stimuli, several previously unreported nonlinear features were unveiled, involving amplification, compression, and hysteresis. The time-resolved analysis reveals that, through the active participation of the sensory neurons, the antenna mechanically responds to enlarge its own range of detection. This behavior augments the capacity of the antennal receiver to detect female sounds, enhancing the male's chance to successfully pursue a passing female.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17068125      PMCID: PMC1636524          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0606319103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

1.  Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells.

Authors:  S Camalet; T Duke; F Jülicher; J Prost
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Essential nonlinearities in hearing.

Authors:  V M Eguíluz; M Ospeck; Y Choe; A J Hudspeth; M O Magnasco
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-05-29       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Sound radiation around a flying fly.

Authors:  Jérôme Sueur; Elizabeth J Tuck; Daniel Robert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Power gain exhibited by motile mechanosensory neurons in Drosophila ears.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; A D L Humphris; J T Albert; D Robert; O Hendrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Flying in tune: sexual recognition in mosquitoes.

Authors:  Gabriella Gibson; Ian Russell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Mosquito hearing: sound-induced antennal vibrations in male and female Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; H Briegel; D Robert
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.312

  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  A boost for hearing in mosquitoes.

Authors:  Ron Hoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Development of Johnston's organ in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel F Eberl; Grace Boekhoff-Falk
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.203

3.  Mathematical modelling of the active hearing process in mosquitoes.

Authors:  D Avitabile; M Homer; A R Champneys; J C Jackson; D Robert
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Time-resolved tympanal mechanics of the locust.

Authors:  J F C Windmill; S Bockenhauer; D Robert
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Synchrony through twice-frequency forcing for sensitive and selective auditory processing.

Authors:  Joseph C Jackson; James F C Windmill; Victoria G Pook; Daniel Robert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Otoacoustic emissions from insect ears: evidence of active hearing?

Authors:  Manfred Kössl; Doreen Möckel; Melanie Weber; Ernst-August Seyfarth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  The predictability of evolution: glimpses into a post-Darwinian world.

Authors:  Simon Conway Morris
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-09-23

Review 8.  Active amplification in insect ears: mechanics, models and molecules.

Authors:  Natasha Mhatre
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Dimorphic olfactory lobes in the arthropoda.

Authors:  Nicholas Strausfeld; Carolina E Reisenman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Quantitative analysis of harmonic convergence in mosquito auditory interactions.

Authors:  Andrew Aldersley; Alan Champneys; Martin Homer; Daniel Robert
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.