Literature DB >> 17066284

Attitudes of European physicians, nurses, patients, and families regarding end-of-life decisions: the ETHICATT study.

Charles L Sprung1, Sara Carmel, Peter Sjokvist, Mario Baras, Simon L Cohen, Paulo Maia, Albertus Beishuizen, Daniel Nalos, Ivan Novak, Mia Svantesson, Julie Benbenishty, Beverly Henderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate attitudes of Europeans regarding end-of-life decisions. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Responses to a questionnaire by physicians and nurses working in ICUs, patients who survived ICU, and families of ICU patients in six European countries were compared for attitudes regarding quality and value of life, ICU treatments, active euthanasia, and place of treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Questionnaires were distributed to 4,389 individuals and completed by 1,899 (43%). Physicians (88%) and nurses (87%) found quality of life more important and value of life less important in their decisions for themselves than patients (51%) and families (63%). If diagnosed with a terminal illness, health professionals wanted fewer ICU admissions, uses of CPR, and ventilators (21%, 8%, 10%, respectively) than patients and families (58%, 49%, 44%, respectively). More physicians (79%) and nurses (61%) than patients (58%) and families (48%) preferred being home or in a hospice if they had a terminal illness with only a short time to live.
CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life was more important for physicians and nurses than patients and families. More medical professionals want fewer ICU treatments and prefer being home or in a hospice for a terminal illness than patients and families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17066284     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-006-0405-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  30 in total

1.  Outcomes research, cost containment, and the fear of health care rationing.

Authors:  J E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients.

Authors:  T J Prendergast; M T Claessens; J M Luce
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Patients' preferences for intensive care.

Authors:  E H Elpern; P A Patterson; D Gloskey; R C Bone
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Changes in forgoing life-sustaining treatments in the United States: concern for the future.

Authors:  C L Sprung; L A Eidelman; R Pizov
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Medical treatment preferences of nursing home residents: relationship to function and concordance with surrogate decision-makers.

Authors:  M B Gerety; L K Chiodo; D N Kanten; M R Tuley; J E Cornell
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Elderly patients' preferences concerning life-support treatment.

Authors:  M J Heap; R Munglani; J R Klinck; A G Males
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Perceived quality of life and preferences for life-sustaining treatment in older adults.

Authors:  R F Uhlmann; R A Pearlman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-03

8.  Evaluation of a "do not resuscitate" policy in intensive care.

Authors:  G C Webster; C D Mazer; C A Potvin; A Fisher; R J Byrick
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Patients' and families' preferences for medical intensive care.

Authors:  M Danis; D L Patrick; L I Southerland; M L Green
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Attitudes of Japanese and Japanese-American physicians towards life-sustaining treatment.

Authors:  A Asai; S Fukuhara; B Lo
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-08-05       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  31 in total

1.  Religion and end-of-life decisions in critical care: where the word meets deed.

Authors:  Dee W Ford
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  [Validation of an advance directive].

Authors:  H Rüddel; M Zenz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  A national survey of Italian physicians' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions following the death of Eluana Englaro.

Authors:  Biagio Solarino; Francesco Bruno; Giacomo Frati; Alessandro Dell'erba; Paola Frati
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  [Patients at the end of life in the intensive care unit: cultural aspects of accompaniment].

Authors:  I-U Grom; D A Vagts; U Kampa; G Pfeiffer; L Schreiber-Winzig; C H R Wiese
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Variability in forgoing life-sustaining treatments: reasons and recommendations.

Authors:  Charles L Sprung; Katerina Rusinova; Otavio T Ranzani
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Integration of palliative care in the context of rapid response: a report from the Improving Palliative Care in the ICU advisory board.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Kusum S Mathews; David E Weissman; Karen J Brasel; Margaret Campbell; J Randall Curtis; Jennifer A Frontera; Michelle Gabriel; Ross M Hays; Anne C Mosenthal; Colleen Mulkerin; Kathleen A Puntillo; Daniel E Ray; Stefanie P Weiss; Rick Bassett; Renee D Boss; Dana R Lustbader
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Does regional variation impact decision-making in the management and palliation of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma? Results from an international survey.

Authors:  Valerie Hurdle; Jean-Francois Ouellet; Elijah Dixon; Thomas J Howard; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles M Vollmer; Francis R Sutherland; Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Understanding intercultural competence in intensive care medicine.

Authors:  Thomas Bein
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  The role of empirical research in bioethics.

Authors:  Alexander A Kon
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

10.  Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Schwarzkopf; Susanne Behrend; Helga Skupin; Isabella Westermann; Niels C Riedemann; Rüdiger Pfeifer; Albrecht Günther; Otto W Witte; Konrad Reinhart; Christiane S Hartog
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.