Literature DB >> 1934202

Evaluation of a "do not resuscitate" policy in intensive care.

G C Webster1, C D Mazer, C A Potvin, A Fisher, R J Byrick.   

Abstract

The decision to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation from a patient within an intensive care unit (ICU) may be a difficult but appropriate one for which there are few guidelines. We describe the formulation of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) policy in our multidisciplinary ICU. To evaluate the effect of implementation of the DNR policy on physician practice and on communication among physicians, nurses, patients and their families, we interviewed physicians and nurses caring for patients designated DNR before (n = 8) and after (n = 17) implementation of the DNR policy. We found that DNR orders in the ICU were not infrequent (2-3 per week). All patients designated DNR were either irreversibly ill or not responsive to maximal therapy, and 22 of 25 were not competent. The DNR order was not accompanied by withdrawal of other therapy in 50% of cases and one patient recovered and was discharged from hospital. The implementation of the DNR policy encouraged greater physician consultation with other physicians, patients and their families. Although there were differences in perception of communication between physicians and nurses, we believe that the DNR policy influenced physician practice and enhanced overall communication in the ICU.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto)

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1934202     DOI: 10.1007/BF03008184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  10 in total

1.  Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill.

Authors:  N G Smedira; B H Evans; L S Grais; N H Cohen; B Lo; M Cooke; W P Schecter; C Fink; E Epstein-Jaffe; C May
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  What physicians should know about the nursing shortage.

Authors:  E Ginzberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Ethical and moral guidelines for the initiation, continuation, and withdrawal of intensive care. American College of Chest Physicians/ Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Panel.

Authors: 
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Who defines futility?

Authors:  S J Youngner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Do-not-resuscitate orders: no longer secret, but still a problem.

Authors:  S J Youngner
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  Perceptions of ethical problems by nurses and doctors.

Authors:  G P Gramelspacher; J D Howell; M J Young
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-03

7.  Resuscitation: how do we decide? A prospective study of physicians' preferences and the clinical course of hospitalized patients.

Authors:  M E Charlson; F L Sax; C R MacKenzie; S D Fields; R L Braham; R G Douglas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The use and implications of do not resuscitate orders in intensive care units.

Authors:  J E Zimmerman; W A Knaus; S M Sharpe; A S Anderson; E A Draper; D P Wagner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The illusion of futility in clinical practice.

Authors:  J D Lantos; P A Singer; R M Walker; G P Gramelspacher; G R Shapiro; M A Sanchez-Gonzalez; C B Stocking; S H Miles; M Siegler
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital. How are they used and what is their impact?

Authors:  S E Bedell; D Pelle; P L Maher; P D Cleary
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Attitudes of European physicians, nurses, patients, and families regarding end-of-life decisions: the ETHICATT study.

Authors:  Charles L Sprung; Sara Carmel; Peter Sjokvist; Mario Baras; Simon L Cohen; Paulo Maia; Albertus Beishuizen; Daniel Nalos; Ivan Novak; Mia Svantesson; Julie Benbenishty; Beverly Henderson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Does regional variation impact decision-making in the management and palliation of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma? Results from an international survey.

Authors:  Valerie Hurdle; Jean-Francois Ouellet; Elijah Dixon; Thomas J Howard; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles M Vollmer; Francis R Sutherland; Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Challenges to code status discussions for pediatric patients.

Authors:  Katherine E Kruse; Jason Batten; Melissa L Constantine; Saraswati Kache; David Magnus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.