Literature DB >> 17065186

Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis: the Scandinavian multicentre, prospective study.

Rune Haaverstad1, Nicola Vitale, Asbjørn Karevold, Giangiuseppe Cappabianca, Arve Tromsdal, Peter Skov Olsen, Lars Köber, Halfdan Ihlen, Kjell Arne Rein, Jan L Svennevig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this report is the prospective, multicentre evaluation of clinical results and haemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis.
METHODS: From April 2001 to June 2003, 166 patients (male:female 125:41; mean (SD) age 61.8 (11.8) years) received an aortic advantage valve prosthesis. Complete cumulative follow-up was 242.7 patient-years (maximum 3.2; mean 1.6 years). Postoperatively, patients underwent early (within 30 days) and 1 year transthoracic echocardiography.
RESULTS: 30 day mortality was 2.4% (n = 4). Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from complications and linearised rates were as follows: 96.9 (1.6)% survival; 94.7 (1.3)% (2.06 patients/year) thrombo-embolism; 99.4 (0.6)% (0.4 patients/year) bleeding; 98.8 (0.9)% (0.8 patients/year) non-structural valve dysfunction; 98.8 (0.9)% (0.8 patients/year) reoperation. Valvular mean pressure gradients ranged from 16 (3) mm Hg for size 19 to 7 (2) mm Hg for size 27 and the corresponding effective orifice areas ranged from 1.2 (0.25) to 3.2 (0.66) cm(2). In all, left ventricular mass significantly decreased (p<0.001) and fractional shortening increased (p<0.001) from postoperative to 1 year echocardiography.
CONCLUSIONS: Haemodynamic performance and early clinical results of Medtronic advantage in the aortic position were satisfactory and comparable with those of other bileaflet valves in current clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17065186      PMCID: PMC1861508          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.086041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  25 in total

1.  Midterm evaluation of the Sorin Bicarbon heart valve prosthesis: single-center experience.

Authors:  Nicola Vitale; Giangiuseppe Cappabianca; Giuseppe Visicchio; Corrado Fondacone; Vito Paradiso; Giuseppe Mannatrizio; Luigi de Luca Tupputi Schinosa
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic ADVANTAGE prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position: echocardiographic evaluation at one year.

Authors:  Heinrich Koertke; Dirk Seifert; Sylvia Drewek-Platena; Reiner Koerfer
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2003-05

3.  An integrated macro/micro approach to evaluating pivot flow within the Medtronic ADVANTAGE bileaflet mechanical heart valve.

Authors:  Mark C S Shu; Jeffery M Gross; Keith K O'Rourke; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2003-07

4.  Doppler assessment of mechanical aortic valve prostheses: effect of valve design and size of the aorta.

Authors:  Julia Mascherbauer; Heinrich Schima; Gerald Maurer; Helmut Baumgartner
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2004-09

5.  Hemodynamic evaluation by Doppler echocardiography of small (less than or equal to 21 mm) prostheses and bioprostheses in the aortic valve position.

Authors:  R Wiseth; O W Levang; E Sande; G Tangen; T Skjaerpe; L Hatle
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study.

Authors:  H Baumgartner; S S Khan; M DeRobertis; L S Czer; G Maurer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Determination of aortic valve area by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in patients with normal and stenotic bioprosthetic valves.

Authors:  R M Rothbart; J L Castriz; L V Harding; C D Russo; S M Teague
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve in the aortic position using the continuity equation.

Authors:  E R Chafizadeh; W A Zoghbi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  The initial experience with the ATS Medical mechanical cardiac valve prosthesis.

Authors:  Robert W Emery; Guido J Van Nooten; Peter J Tesar
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Assessment of left-ventricular mass and its response to antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  D B Rowlands; D R Glover; M A Ireland; R A McLeay; T J Stallard; R D Watson; W A Littler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.