Literature DB >> 12607652

The initial experience with the ATS Medical mechanical cardiac valve prosthesis.

Robert W Emery1, Guido J Van Nooten, Peter J Tesar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: From May 1994 through October 2000, a total of 1,146 patients underwent valve replacement with the ATS Medical mechanical cardiac valve prosthesis under a study protocol approved by international ethics committees (non-United States participants) or under a United States Food and Drug Administration-approved Investigational Device Exemption study. The study took place at 19 domestic and three international centers.
METHODS: As required by the Food and Drug Administration's Heart Valve Guidance Document, only isolated implants were included in the study (double-valve implants were excluded), with operative and follow-up data collected from each center.
RESULTS: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was conducted in 801 patients (309 with coronary bypass) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 345 patients (78 with coronary bypass). Overall operative (< or = 30 days post implant) mortality was 2.1% (17 AVR = 2.1%, 7 MVR = 2.0%), 7 of which (AVR = 4, MVR = 3) were valve related. In 2,086 patient-years (1,459 AVR patient-years, 627 MVR patient-years) of follow-up, there were an additional 50 patient deaths of these, 18 were valve related, 9 due to anticoagulant related bleeding, 5 sudden/unexplained, and 1 each after stroke, thrombosis, prosthetic valve endocarditis, and thromboembolism. Late (>30 days post implant) valve-related complications included: transient and chronic thromboembolism (27 AVR (linearized rate 1.85%/patient-year) and 20 MVR (3.19%/patient-year), of which 11/47 (0.53%/patient-year) had chronic deficits, thrombosis (1 AVR = 0.07%/patient-year and 4 MVR = 0.64%/patient-year), paravalvular leak (10 AVR = 0.69%/patient-year and 8 MVR = 1.28%/patient-year), anticoagulant related hemorrhage (34 AVR = 2.33%/patient-year and 8 MVR = 1.28%/patient-year), prosthetic valve endocarditis (3 AVR = 0.21%/patient-year and 2 MVR = 0.32%/patient-year), and structural valve failure or dysfunction (0%). Echocardiographic gradients were proportional to valve size and did not significantly change over the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: This study documented the ATS Medical mechanical cardiac valve prosthesis to be a valuable addition to the surgeon's armamentarium in the treatment of cardiac valvular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12607652     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04537-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  Discrepancy between Doppler and catheter measurements of pressure gradients across small-size prosthetic valve.

Authors:  Takuya Yamashita; Yukinori Moriyama; Naoyuki Sata; Naokazu Hamada; Takashi Horinouchi; Shigeru Amitani; Kenkichi Miyahara; Kentaro Setoyama; Kazuhiro Misumi; Hiroshi Sakamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-02

2.  Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis: the Scandinavian multicentre, prospective study.

Authors:  Rune Haaverstad; Nicola Vitale; Asbjørn Karevold; Giangiuseppe Cappabianca; Arve Tromsdal; Peter Skov Olsen; Lars Köber; Halfdan Ihlen; Kjell Arne Rein; Jan L Svennevig
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Twelve years of experience with the ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses.

Authors:  Shinichiro Taniguchi; Koji Hashizume; Tsuneo Ariyoshi; Yoichi Hisata; Kazuyoshi Tanigawa; Takashi Miura; Tomohiro Odate; Seiji Matsukuma; Shun Nakaji; Kiyoyuki Eishi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-07-06

Review 4.  Heart valve replacement: which valve for which patient?

Authors:  Joseph Huh; Faisal Bakaeen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.931

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.