Literature DB >> 17063403

Workers' beliefs and expectations affect return to work over 12 months.

Martijn W Heymans1, Henrica C W de Vet, Dirk L Knol, Paulien M Bongers, Bart W Koes, Willem van Mechelen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Successful management of workers on sick leave due to low back pain depends on the identification by the occupational physician of modifiable prognostic factors in the early phase of sick-leave. The prognostic value of factors which influence the course of low back pain and return to work in occupational health care is unclear.
METHODS: Secondary data analysis in a cohort of 299 workers on sick leave between 3 and 6 weeks due to low back pain was applied. We investigated the association of a broad set of prognostic indicators related to characteristics of worker, job, low back pain and psychosocial issues on return to work lasting at least 4 weeks (lasting-RTW) and minimally 1 day of first return to work (first-RTW). Relationships were studied using Cox regression analysis and covered a follow-up period of 12 months. The explained variation of the models was also calculated.
RESULTS: The median time to return to work using lasting-RTW and first-RTW was 76 and 71 days respectively. In addition to individual analysis of potential predictive factors a backward selection procedure resulted in the following multivariable model: self-predicted timing of return to work, pain intensity, job satisfaction, social support, pain radiation, expectations of treatment succes of the occupational physician. Similar results were found for first-RTW. The explained variance of the multivariate model of lasting-RTW was 18%.
CONCLUSIONS: Factors concerning the expectations and beliefs of the worker affected the RTW process. Knowledge of these factors by the occupational physician in the early phase of low back pain and sick-leave may contribute to solutions to promote return to work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17063403     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-006-9058-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  41 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial approaches to the prevention of chronic pain: the low back paradigm.

Authors:  N A Kendall
Journal:  Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.098

2.  The economic burden of back pain in the UK.

Authors:  N Maniadakis; A Gray
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed.

Authors:  Cecilia Nordqvist; Christina Holmqvist; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

4.  Measuring sick leave: a comparison of self-reported data on sick leave and data from company records.

Authors:  M N M van Poppel; H C W de Vet; B W Koes; T Smid; L M Bouter
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.611

5.  Work-related recovery expectations and the prognosis of chronic low back pain within a workers' compensation setting.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Michele C Battié
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance.

Authors:  Johan W S Vlaeyen; Ank M J Kole-Snijders; Ruben G B Boeren; H van Eek
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes--a prospective study.

Authors:  Donald C Cole; Michael V Mondloch; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Identifying psychosocial variables in patients with acute work-related low back pain: the importance of fear-avoidance beliefs.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-10

10.  Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice.

Authors:  J Coste; G Delecoeuillerie; A Cohen de Lara; J M Le Parc; J B Paolaggi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-26
View more
  41 in total

1.  Individual expectation: an overlooked, but pertinent, factor in the treatment of individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06-30

2.  The effect of recalled previous work environment on return to work after a rehabilitation program including vocational aspects for trauma patients.

Authors:  Pierluigi Ballabeni; Cyrille Burrus; François Luthi; Charles Gobelet; Olivier Dériaz
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

3.  Distressed, immobilized, or lacking employer support? A sub-classification of acute work-related low back pain.

Authors:  Silje Endresen Reme; William S Shaw; Ivan A Steenstra; Mary Jane Woiszwillo; Glenn Pransky; Steven J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-12

4.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

5.  Return to work in a cohort of low back pain patients: development and validation of a clinical prediction rule.

Authors:  Martijn W Heymans; Johannes R Anema; Stef van Buuren; Dirk L Knol; Willem van Mechelen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-18

6.  Behavioral determinants as predictors of return to work after long-term sickness absence: an application of the theory of planned behavior.

Authors:  Sandra Brouwer; Boudien Krol; Michiel F Reneman; Ute Bültmann; Renée-Louise Franche; Jac J L van der Klink; Johan W Groothoff
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-03-31

Review 7.  Comparison of risk factors predicting return to work between patients with subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  C A M Heitz; R Hilfiker; L M Bachmann; H Joronen; T Lorenz; D Uebelhart; A Klipstein; Florian Brunner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A randomized sham-controlled trial of a neurodynamic technique in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Don D Price; Michael E Robinson; Kevin R Vincent; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Exploring the contribution of patient-reported and clinician based variables for the prediction of low back work status.

Authors:  Martijn W Heymans; Jon J Ford; Joan M McMeeken; Alexander Chan; Henrica C W de Vet; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-06-15

Review 10.  Towards a theory of chronic pain.

Authors:  A Vania Apkarian; Marwan N Baliki; Paul Y Geha
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 11.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.