Literature DB >> 19565277

Comparison of risk factors predicting return to work between patients with subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain: systematic review.

C A M Heitz1, R Hilfiker, L M Bachmann, H Joronen, T Lorenz, D Uebelhart, A Klipstein, Florian Brunner.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to provide an inventory of predictive instruments and their constituting parameters associated with return to work in patients with subacute (2-10 weeks pain duration) and chronic (10-24 weeks pain duration) non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Data sources included systematic review in Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Central, PEDro, Psyndex, PsychInfo/PsycLit, and Sociofile up to September 2008, in reference lists of systematic reviews on risk factors, and of included studies. For the systematic review, two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and quality, and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Risk factors were inventorised and grouped into a somatic and psychosocial domain. 23 studies reporting on subacute and 16 studies reporting on chronic patients were included. The studies on subacute patients reported on a total of 56 biomedical factors out of which 35 (63%) were modifiable and 61 psychosocial factors out of which 51 (84%) were modifiable. The corresponding values in studies on chronic patients were 44 biomedical [27 (62%) modifiable] and 61 [40 (66%) modifiable] respectively. Our data suggest that the interdisciplinary approach in patients at risk to develop persistent NSLBP is justified in both, the subacute and chronic disease stages. Psychosocial interventions might be more effective in subacute stages since a higher proportion of modifiable risk factors were identified in that group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19565277      PMCID: PMC2899435          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1083-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  42 in total

1.  Predictors and modifiers of treatment effect influencing sick leave in subacute low back pain patients.

Authors:  Eli Molde Hagen; Erling Svensen; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Workers' beliefs and expectations affect return to work over 12 months.

Authors:  Martijn W Heymans; Henrica C W de Vet; Dirk L Knol; Paulien M Bongers; Bart W Koes; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

3.  Work-related factors contributing to chronic disability in low back pain.

Authors:  Isabelle Soucy; Manon Truchon; Denis Côté
Journal:  Work       Date:  2006

4.  Length of disability prognosis in acute occupational low back pain: development and testing of a practical approach.

Authors:  Glenn S Pransky; Santosh K Verma; Lee Okurowski; Barbara Webster
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards.

Authors:  A Laupacis; N Sekar; I G Stiell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Predictors of return to work in patients sick listed for sub-acute low back pain: a 12-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Kjersti Storheim; Jens Ivar Brox; Inger Holm; Kari Bø
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  The effects of common medical interventions on pain, back function, and work resumption in patients with chronic low back pain: A prospective 2-year cohort study in six countries.

Authors:  T H Hansson; E K Hansson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  ISSLS prize winner: early predictors of chronic work disability: a prospective, population-based study of workers with back injuries.

Authors:  Judith A Turner; Gary Franklin; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Lianne Sheppard; Bert Stover; Rae Wu; Jeremy V Gluck; Thomas M Wickizer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Shared and independent associations of psychosocial factors on work status among men with subacute low back pain.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Adrienne Means-Christensen; Mark A Slater; Thomas L Patterson; John S Webster; J Hampton Atkinson
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 10.  Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain among working age adults.

Authors:  K Karjalainen; A Malmivaara; M van Tulder; R Roine; M Jauhiainen; H Hurri; B Koes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  14 in total

1.  Supervisors' perceptions of organizational policies are associated with their likelihood to accommodate back-injured workers.

Authors:  Connor McGuire; Vicki L Kristman; William S Shaw; Patrick Loisel; Paula Reguly; Kelly Williams-Whitt; Sophie Soklaridis
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Supervisor Autonomy and Considerate Leadership Style are Associated with Supervisors' Likelihood to Accommodate Back Injured Workers.

Authors:  Connor McGuire; Vicki L Kristman; William Shaw; Kelly Williams-Whitt; Paula Reguly; Sophie Soklaridis
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-09

3.  Pain and functional outcomes after outpatient physiotherapy in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Martin Alfuth; Dieter W Welsink
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Predictive ability of a modified Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in an acute/subacute low back pain working population.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Markus Melloh; Michael Yelland; Brendan Burkett; Anne Roiko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cost-utility of cognitive behavioral therapy for low back pain from the commercial payer perspective.

Authors:  Giulia Norton; Christine M McDonough; Howard Cabral; Michael Shwartz; James F Burgess
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Using a psychosocial subgroup assignment to predict sickness absence in a working population with neck and back pain.

Authors:  Cecilia Bergström; Jan Hagberg; Lennart Bodin; Irene Jensen; Gunnar Bergström
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Jenna Ellis; Rachel Ogilvie; Antti Malmivaara; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-28

8.  The Nijmegen decision tool for chronic low back pain. Development of a clinical decision tool for secondary or tertiary spine care specialists.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Jan van Loon; Jacques van Limbeek; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Overview of data-synthesis in systematic reviews of studies on outcome prediction models.

Authors:  Tobias van den Berg; Martijn W Heymans; Stephanie S Leone; David Vergouw; Jill A Hayden; Arianne P Verhagen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gwenllian Wynne-Jones; Jemma Cowen; Joanne L Jordan; Olalekan Uthman; Chris J Main; Nick Glozier; Danielle van der Windt
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.