Literature DB >> 17060827

Item banks and their potential applications to health status assessment in diverse populations.

Elizabeth A Hahn1, David Cella, Rita K Bode, Richard Gershon, Jin-Shei Lai.   

Abstract

In the context of an ethnically diverse, aging society, attention is increasingly turning to health-related quality of life measurement to evaluate healthcare and treatment options for chronic diseases. When evaluating and treating symptoms and concerns such as fatigue, pain, or physical function, reliable and accurate assessment is a priority. Modern psychometric methods have enabled us to move from long, static tests that provide inefficient and often inaccurate assessment of individual patients, to computerized adaptive tests (CATs) that can precisely measure individuals on health domains of interest. These modern methods, collectively referred to as item response theory (IRT), can produce calibrated "item banks" from larger pools of questions. From these banks, CATs can be conducted on individuals to produce their scores on selected domains. Item banks allow for comparison of patients across different question sets because the patient's score is expressed on a common scale. Other advantages of using item banks include flexibility in terms of the degree of precision desired; interval measurement properties under most circumstances; realistic capability for accurate individual assessment over time (using CAT); and measurement equivalence across different patient populations. This work summarizes the process used in the creation and evaluation of item banks and reviews their potential contributions and limitations regarding outcome assessment and patient care, particularly when they are applied across people of different cultural backgrounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17060827     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245145.21869.5b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  16 in total

1.  Occurrences and sources of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in patient-reported outcome measures: Description of DIF methods, and review of measures of depression, quality of life and general health.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Mildred Ramirez; Jin-Shei Lai; Stephanie Silver
Journal:  Psychol Sci Q       Date:  2008

2.  Health literacy assessment using talking touchscreen technology (Health LiTT): a new item response theory-based measure of health literacy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hahn; Seung W Choi; James W Griffith; Kathleen J Yost; David W Baker
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011

3.  Measurement in a multi-ethnic society. Overview to the special issue.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Anita L Stewart; Leo S Morales; Sidney M Stahl
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The PROMIS smoking assessment toolkit--background and introduction to supplement.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Edelen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 5.  Evolution of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Their Role in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Cindy J Nowinski; Deborah M Miller; David Cella
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Development of self-report measures of social attitudes that act as environmental barriers and facilitators for people with disabilities.

Authors:  Sofia F Garcia; Elizabeth A Hahn; Susan Magasi; Jin-Shei Lai; Patrick Semik; Joy Hammel; Allen W Heinemann
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Initial Evaluation of the Pediatric PROMIS® Health Domains in Children and Adolescents With Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Carlton Dampier; Vaughn Barry; Heather E Gross; Yang Lui; Courtney D Thornburg; Darren A DeWalt; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Demographic correlates of fatigue in the US general population: results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) initiative.

Authors:  Doerte U Junghaenel; Christopher Christodoulou; Jin-Shei Lai; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Construct validity of the SF-12 among American Indian and Alaska Native people using two known scoring methods.

Authors:  Sandra L Edwards; Molly McFadden; Anne P Lanier; Maureen A Murtaugh; Elizabeth D Ferucci; Diana G Redwood; Lillian Tom-Orme; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

10.  Bilingual health literacy assessment using the Talking Touchscreen/la Pantalla Parlanchina: Development and pilot testing.

Authors:  Kathleen J Yost; Kimberly Webster; David W Baker; Seung W Choi; Rita K Bode; Elizabeth A Hahn
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.