Literature DB >> 21843744

Demographic correlates of fatigue in the US general population: results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) initiative.

Doerte U Junghaenel1, Christopher Christodoulou, Jin-Shei Lai, Arthur A Stone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate demographic correlates of fatigue in the US general population using a new instrument developed by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS). First, we examined correlations between the new PROMIS instrument and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) and the SF-36v2 Vitality subscale. Based on prior findings, we further examined several demographic correlates of fatigue: whether women would report higher levels of fatigue compared to men, and whether married people would experience lower levels of fatigue compared to unmarried people. We also explored the relationship between age, education, and fatigue.
METHODS: Analyses were based on fatigue ratings by 666 individuals from the general population. Fatigue was assessed with the new PROMIS instrument, the FACIT-F, and the SF-36v2 Vitality subscale. Differences in fatigue were examined with independent samples t-tests and univariate ANOVAs.
RESULTS: The three fatigue instruments were highly intercorrelated. Confirming prior reports, women reported higher levels of fatigue than men. Married participants reported significantly less fatigue than their unmarried counterparts. Univariate ANOVAs yielded a main effect for participants' age; younger participants gave significantly higher fatigue ratings. We also found a main effect for participants' education. Participants with a masters or doctoral degree had significantly lower ratings of fatigue than participants with some college education and education up to high school.
CONCLUSION: Female gender, not being married, younger age and lower educational attainment were each associated with increased fatigue in the general population and the three fatigue instruments performed equally well in detecting the observed associations.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21843744      PMCID: PMC3744100          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  44 in total

Review 1.  Factors related to fatigue; priority of interventions to reduce or eliminate fatigue and the exploration of a multidisciplinary research model for further study of fatigue.

Authors:  L J Tiesinga; T W Dassen; R J Halfens; W J van den Heuvel
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.837

2.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group.

Authors:  K Fukuda; S E Straus; I Hickie; M C Sharpe; J G Dobbins; A Komaroff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Gender differences in fatigue: biopsychosocial factors relating to fatigue in men and women.

Authors:  J M Bensing; R L Hulsman; K M Schreurs
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Clarifying the relationship between unexplained chronic fatigue and psychiatric morbidity: results from a community survey in Great Britain.

Authors:  P Skapinakis; G Lewis; H Meltzer
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Having a fit: impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT's unidimensionality assumption.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Michael A Kallen; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The epidemiology of chronic fatigue in San Francisco.

Authors:  L Steele; J G Dobbins; K Fukuda; M Reyes; B Randall; M Koppelman; W C Reeves
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1998-09-28       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue: an illustration of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale.

Authors:  Jin-shei Lai; David Cella; Chih-Hung Chang; Rita K Bode; Allen W Heinemann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Evaluating the dimensionality of perceived cognitive function.

Authors:  Jin-Shei Lai; Zeeshan Butt; Lynne Wagner; Jerry J Sweet; Jennifer L Beaumont; Janette Vardy; Paul B Jacobsen; Pamela J Shapiro; Sheri R Jacobs; David Cella
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Population based study of fatigue and psychological distress.

Authors:  T Pawlikowska; T Chalder; S R Hirsch; P Wallace; D J Wright; S C Wessely
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-03-19
View more
  35 in total

1.  Identification of distinct fatigue trajectories in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Doerte U Junghaenel; Jules Cohen; Stefan Schneider; Anu R Neerukonda; Joan E Broderick
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Sleep, Depression, and Fatigue in Late Postpartum.

Authors:  Karen A Thomas; Susan Spieker
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.412

3.  Energy, fatigue, or both? A bifactor modeling approach to the conceptualization and measurement of vitality.

Authors:  Nina Deng; Rick Guyer; John E Ware
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  A systematic review of the association between fatigue and cognition in chronic noncommunicable diseases.

Authors:  Victoria Menzies; Debra L Kelly; Gee S Yang; Angela Starkweather; Debra E Lyon
Journal:  Chronic Illn       Date:  2019-03-18

5.  Development and Validation of the Norfolk Quality of Life Fatigue Tool (QOL-F): A New Measure of Perception of Fatigue.

Authors:  Etta J Vinik; Aaron I Vinik; Serina A Neumann; Rajan Lamichhane; Steven Morrison; Sheri R Colberg; Ying-Chuen Lai; James Paulson; Richard Handel; Carolina Casellini; Kim Hodges; Joshua Edwards; Henri K Parson
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  Measurement of fatigue in cancer, stroke, and HIV using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) scale.

Authors:  Zeeshan Butt; Jin-Shei Lai; Deepa Rao; Allen W Heinemann; Alex Bill; David Cella
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Experiential wellbeing data from the American Time Use Survey: Comparisons with other methods and analytic illustrations with age and income.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Stefan Schneider; Alan Krueger; Joseph E Schwartz; Angus Deaton
Journal:  Soc Indic Res       Date:  2016-12-22

8.  Development and testing of item response theory-based item banks and short forms for eye, skin and lung problems in sarcoidosis.

Authors:  David E Victorson; Seung Choi; Marc A Judson; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Recommendations for high-priority research on cancer-related fatigue in children and adults.

Authors:  Andrea M Barsevick; Michael R Irwin; Pamela Hinds; Andrew Miller; Ann Berger; Paul Jacobsen; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Bryce B Reeve; Karen Mustian; Ann O'Mara; Jin-Shei Lai; Michael Fisch; David Cella
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Different Phenotyping Approaches Lead to Dissimilar Biologic Profiles in Men With Chronic Fatigue After Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Li Rebekah Feng; Kristin Dickinson; Neila Kline; Leorey N Saligan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.