Literature DB >> 28913785

Evolution of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Their Role in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials.

Cindy J Nowinski1, Deborah M Miller2, David Cella3.   

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are playing an increasing role in multiple sclerosis (MS) research and practice, and are essential for understanding the effects that MS and MS treatments have on patients' lives. PROs are captured directly from patients and include symptoms, function, health status, and health-related quality of life. In this article, we review different categories (e.g., generic, targeted, preference-based) of PRO measures and considerations in selecting a measure. The PROs included in MS clinical research have evolved over time, as have the measures used to assess them. We describe findings from recent MS clinical trials that included PROs when evaluating Food and Drug Administration-approved disease-modifying therapies (e.g., daclizumab, teriflunomide). Variation in the measures used in these trials makes it difficult to draw any conclusions from the data. We therefore suggest a standardized approach to PRO assessment in MS research and describe 2 generic, National Institutes of Health-supported measurement systems [Neuro-QoL and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)] that would facilitate such an approach. The use of PROs in MS care and research is expanding beyond clinical trials, as is demonstrated by examples from comparative effectiveness and other patient-centered research. The importance of PRO assessment is expected to continue to grow in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Health-related quality of life; Multiple sclerosis; Patient-reported outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28913785      PMCID: PMC5722775          DOI: 10.1007/s13311-017-0571-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotherapeutics        ISSN: 1878-7479            Impact factor:   7.620


  114 in total

1.  A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment.

Authors:  D Cella; C H Chang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Use of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite to predict disability in relapsing MS.

Authors:  R A Rudick; G Cutter; M Baier; E Fisher; D Dougherty; B Weinstock-Guttman; M K Mass; D Miller; N A Simonian
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument.

Authors:  D F Cella; K Dineen; B Arnason; A Reder; K A Webster; G karabatsos; C Chang; S Lloyd; J Steward; D Stefoski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Developing a disease-specific quality of life measure for people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  H L Ford; E Gerry; A Tennant; D Whalley; R Haigh; M H Johnson
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.477

6.  Changes in quality of life and coping among people with multiple sclerosis over a 2 year period.

Authors:  Marita P McCabe; Mark Stokes; Elizabeth McDonald
Journal:  Psychol Health Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Validating Neuro-QoL short forms and targeted scales with people who have multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Deborah M Miller; Francois Bethoux; David Victorson; Cindy J Nowinski; Sarah Buono; Jin-Shei Lai; Katy Wortman; James L Burns; Claudia Moy; David Cella
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Using focus groups to inform the Neuro-QOL measurement tool: exploring patient-centered, health-related quality of life concepts across neurological conditions.

Authors:  Lori Perez; Jennifer Huang; Liz Jansky; Cindy Nowinski; David Victorson; Amy Peterman; David Cella
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.230

9.  Doctors and patients don't agree: cross sectional study of patients' and doctors' perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; Z McDowell; C K Wong; P J Dorman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-05-31

10.  The PROMIS of QALYs.

Authors:  Janel Hanmer; David Feeny; Baruch Fischhoff; Ron D Hays; Rachel Hess; Paul A Pilkonis; Dennis A Revicki; Mark S Roberts; Joel Tsevat; Lan Yu
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  14 in total

1.  Multiple Sclerosis: Unprecedented Progress But Significant Challenges Ahead.

Authors:  Devon S Conway; Le H Hua; Jeffrey A Cohen
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  The 27-Item Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Questionnaire: A New Brief Measure Including Treatment Burden and Work Life.

Authors:  Helen Beckmann; Christoph Heesen; Matthias Augustin; Christine Blome
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2021-12-07

3.  Patient-Centered Core Impact Sets: What They are and Why We Need Them.

Authors:  Eleanor M Perfetto; Elisabeth M Oehrlein; T Rosie Love; Silke Schoch; Annie Kennedy; Jennifer Bright
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Remote visits for people with multiple sclerosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Austria: The TELE MS randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patrick Altmann; Fritz Leutmezer; Markus Ponleitner; Dominik Ivkic; Nik Krajnc; Paulus Stefan Rommer; Thomas Berger; Gabriel Bsteh
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-07-11

5.  Treatment satisfaction in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis initiated on teriflunomide in routine clinical practice: Australian observational data.

Authors:  Todd A Hardy; John Parratt; Heidi Beadnall; Stefan Blum; Richard Macdonell; Roy G Beran; Neil Shuey; Andrew Lee; William Carroll; Cameron Shaw; Richard Worrell; Jana Moody; Mamdouh Sedhom; Michael Barnett; Steve Vucic
Journal:  BMJ Neurol Open       Date:  2022-07-04

6.  Patient-reported outcome measures in MS: Do development processes and patient involvement support valid quantification of clinically important variables?

Authors:  Trishna Bharadia; Jo Vandercappellen; Tanuja Chitnis; Piet Eelen; Birgit Bauer; Giampaolo Brichetto; Andrew Lloyd; Hollie Schmidt; Miriam King; Jennifer Fitzgerald; Thomas Hach; Jeremy Hobart
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2022-06-22

7.  Objectively assessed physiological, physical, and cognitive function along with patient-reported outcomes during the first 2 years of Alemtuzumab treatment in multiple sclerosis: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Lars G Hvid; Egon Stenager; Ulrik Dalgas
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.682

8.  The Smartphone App haMSter for Tracking Patient-Reported Outcomes in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Protocol for a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Patrick Altmann; Werner Hinterberger; Fritz Leutmezer; Markus Ponleitner; Tobias Monschein; Tobias Zrzavy; Gudrun Zulehner; Barbara Kornek; Rupert Lanzenberger; Klaus Berek; Paulus Stefan Rommer; Thomas Berger; Gabriel Bsteh
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-05-07

Review 9.  Interferons and Multiple Sclerosis: Lessons from 25 Years of Clinical and Real-World Experience with Intramuscular Interferon Beta-1a (Avonex).

Authors:  Stanley L Cohan; Barry A Hendin; Anthony T Reder; Kyle Smoot; Robin Avila; Jason P Mendoza; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.749

10.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Alexander T Hawkins; Russell L Rothman; Timothy M Geiger; Juan R Canedo; Kamren Edwards-Hollingsworth; David C LaNeve; David F Penson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.