Literature DB >> 34591686

A retrospective review of MRI features associated with metastasis-free survival in women with breast cancer: focusing on skin thickening and skin enhancement.

Valentine Mberu1, Jennifer McFarlane2, E Jane Macaskill3, Andrew Evans1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify associations between MRI-detected skin thickening and enhancement and metastasis-free survival (MFS) given recent reports of skin thickening on ultrasound being a poorer prognostic indicator.
METHODS: Interrogation of a prospectively collected database of ultrasound-visible breast lesions showed 214 lesions with pre-treatment MRIs available for analysis in a single centre. Data on MFS was prospectively collected. Retrospective MRI review was performed blinded to outcome. Imaging factors recorded were presence of skin thickening and enhancement, non-mass-enhancement (NME) and abnormal nodes, mass characteristics, perilesional oedema and background parenchymal enhancement. Statistical analysis used chi-squared test, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the Log-rank test and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 5.6 years, 21 (10%) of 212 patients developed distant metastases. Skin thickening [24 of 30 (80%) vs 169 of 184 (92%), p = 0.043] and skin enhancement [15 of 20 (75%) vs 178 of 194 (92%), p = 0.016] were associated with poorer MFS. Large index lesion size [p < 0.001, AUC 0.823], large sum of masses [p < 0.001, AUC 0.813], increasing total lesion extent including NME [p < 0.001, AUC 0.749] and abnormal axillary nodes [55 of 66 (83%) vs 138 of 148 (93%), p = 0.024] were also associated with poorer MFS.
CONCLUSIONS: Skin thickening and enhancement on breast MRI are associated with poorer MFS. These findings should be taken into account when managing patients with invasive breast cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Skin enhancement on breast MRI at diagnosis is associated with metastases development. Skin thickening on breast MRI is associated with future metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34591686      PMCID: PMC8631024          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  26 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging screening in women at genetic risk of breast cancer: imaging and analysis protocol for the UK multicentre study. UK MRI Breast Screening Study Advisory Group.

Authors:  J Brown; D Buckley; A Coulthard; A K Dixon; J M Dixon; D F Easton; R A Eeles; D G Evans; F G Gilbert; M Graves; C Hayes; J P Jenkins; A P Jones; S F Keevil; M O Leach; G P Liney; S M Moss; A R Padhani; G J Parker; L J Pointon; B A Ponder; T W Redpath; J P Sloane; L W Turnbull; L G Walker; R M Warren
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Accuracy of tumor size measurements performed by magnetic resonance, ultrasound and mammography, and their correlation with pathological size in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Ana Belén Cuesta Cuesta; María Dolores Martín Ríos; María Rosario Noguero Meseguer; Juan Antonio García Velasco; María de Matías Martínez; Sara Bartolomé Sotillos; Eduardo Abreu Griego
Journal:  Cir Esp (Engl Ed)       Date:  2019-06-09

3.  MR imaging features associated with distant metastasis-free survival of patients with invasive breast cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Sung Eun Song; Sung Ui Shin; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Han Suk Ryu; Kwangsoo Kim; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Peritumoral edema as a biomarker of the aggressiveness of breast cancer: results of a retrospective study on a 3 T scanner.

Authors:  Giovanna Panzironi; Giuliana Moffa; Francesca Galati; Flaminia Marzocca; Veronica Rizzo; Federica Pediconi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Is the presence of mammographic comedo calcification really a prognostic factor for small screen-detected invasive breast cancers?

Authors:  J J James; A J Evans; S E Pinder; R D Macmillan; A R M Wilson; I O Ellis
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Lymphovascular invasion, as a prognostic marker in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  G Gurleyik; E Gurleyik; F Aker; A Aktekin; S Emir; O Gungor; A Saglam
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.090

7.  Computer assisted analysis of MR-mammography reveals association between contrast enhancement and occurrence of distant metastasis.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Ramy Zoubi; Hartmut P Burmeister; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser; Matthias Dietzel
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-05-07

8.  Comparison of MRI and US in Tumor Size Evaluation of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Onur Taydaş; Gamze Durhan; Meltem Gülsün Akpınar; Figen Başaran Demirkazık
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-04-01

9.  Mammographic casting-type calcification is an independent prognostic factor in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Yan Li; Jian Cao; Yidong Zhou; Feng Mao; Songjie Shen; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Prognostic Factors of Disease Recurrence in Breast Cancer Using Quantitative and Qualitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Parameters.

Authors:  Jeongmin Lee; Sung Hun Kim; Bong Joo Kang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.