Literature DB >> 18256879

Correlation of mammographic calcifications with Her-2/neu overexpression in primary breast carcinomas.

X Wang1, L Chao, L Chen, B Tian, G Ma, Y Zang, M Hua, J Sun.   

Abstract

HER-2/neu is a valuable therapeutic and prognostic marker in primary breast carcinomas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between mammographic calcifications and HER-2/neu overexpression in primary breast carcinomas and assess its clinical perspective. A retrospective study of 152 preoperative mammograms in patients with breast carcinoma was performed. Expression of HER-2/neu was determined by immunohistochemical staining on 152 tissues that comprised specimens of 11 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 141 primary invasive carcinomas. Mammographic calcifications were evaluated according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), fourth edition. Calcifications were found in 73 (48.0%) out of 152 patients by mammography finding. Calcifications were more common in carcinomas with HER-2/neu overexpression (45:73, 61.6%) than in those without HER-2/neu overexpression (28:79, 35.4%; P = 0.001). Of the 73 carcinomas with calcifications on mammography, mass with spiculated margin as an associated finding of calcifications was more significantly frequent in carcinomas with HER-2/neu overexpression (15 of 45, 33.3%) than in those without HER-2/neu overexpression (2 of 28, 7.1%; P = 0.036). Fine linear morphology was more common in carcinomas with HER-2/neu overexpression (15:45, 33.3%) when compared with those without HER-2/neu overexpression (2:28, 7.1%; P = 0.036). Clustered distribution of calcifications was more common in carcinomas with HER-2/neu overexpression (26:45, 57.8%) compared with carcinomas without HER-2/neu overexpression (6:28, 21.4%; P = 0.048). Mammographic calcifications are correlated with HER-2/neu overexpression in primary breast carcinomas. Calcifications detected during screening mammography are not only of diagnostic value but of use in determining therapeutic options and prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18256879      PMCID: PMC3043864          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-008-9105-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  16 in total

1.  Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Jennifer E Ochsner; Kathryn J Fowler; Jason P Fine; Lonie R Salkowski; Daniel L Rubin; Gale A Sisney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparison of pathological and biological features of symptomatic and mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  R A Walker; S J Dearing; L A Brown
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Differences in the pathologic and molecular features of intraductal breast carcinoma between younger and older women.

Authors:  Neesha A Rodrigues; Deborah Dillon; Darryl Carter; Nicole Parisot; Bruce G Haffty
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer: pooled results of two large European randomized trials.

Authors:  A C Voogd; M Nielsen; J L Peterse; M Blichert-Toft; H Bartelink; M Overgaard; G van Tienhoven; K W Andersen; R J Sylvester; J A van Dongen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Results of the National Cancer Institute early breast cancer trial.

Authors:  K Straus; A Lichter; M Lippman; D Danforth; S Swain; K Cowan; E deMoss; H MacDonald; S Steinberg; T d'Angelo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1992

6.  Prognostic value of histologic grade nuclear components of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR). An improved score modification based on a multivariate analysis of 1262 invasive ductal breast carcinomas.

Authors:  V Le Doussal; M Tubiana-Hulin; S Friedman; K Hacene; F Spyratos; M Brunet
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer. An overview of the randomized trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Non-palpable breast carcinomas: correlation of mammographically detected malignant-appearing microcalcifications and molecular prognostic factors.

Authors:  Michalis V Karamouzis; Eleni Likaki-Karatza; Panagiota Ravazoula; Filitsa A Badra; Dimitrios Koukouras; Evagelos Tzorakoleftherakis; Athanasios G Papavassiliou; Haralambos P Kalofonos
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Correlations between the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and C-erbB-2 oncogene expression. Nottingham Breast Team.

Authors:  A J Evans; S E Pinder; I O Ellis; D M Sibbering; C W Elston; D N Poller; A R Wilson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 10.  Biologic and therapeutic role of HER2 in cancer.

Authors:  Sylvie Ménard; Serenella Marja Pupa; Manuela Campiglio; Elda Tagliabue
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  7 in total

1.  Microcalcifications in breast cancer: novel insights into the molecular mechanism and functional consequence of mammary mineralisation.

Authors:  R F Cox; A Hernandez-Santana; S Ramdass; G McMahon; J H Harmey; M P Morgan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Correlation of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis features of self-detected breast cancers with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2/neu status.

Authors:  Chaitra Sonthineni; Namita Mohindra; Vinita Agrawal; Zafar Neyaz; Neeraj Jain; Sabaretnam Mayilvagnan; Gaurav Agarwal
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

Review 3.  A Brief Review about the Role of Nanomaterials, Mineral-Organic Nanoparticles, and Extra-Bone Calcification in Promoting Carcinogenesis and Tumor Progression.

Authors:  Marina Senchukova
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2019-08-28

4.  Oxalate induces breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrés M Castellaro; Alfredo Tonda; Hugo H Cejas; Héctor Ferreyra; Beatriz L Caputto; Oscar A Pucci; German A Gil
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Association between Ultrasound Features and the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assays in Patients with Oestrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Eun Young Chae; Woo Kyung Moon; Hak Hee Kim; Won Hwa Kim; Joo Hee Cha; Hee Jung Shin; Woo Jung Choi; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh; Sae Byul Lee; Sei Hyun Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Gene expression profiling of calcifications in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sung Ui Shin; Jeonghoon Lee; Ju Han Kim; Won Hwa Kim; Sung Eun Song; Ajung Chu; Hoe Suk Kim; Wonshik Han; Han Suk Ryu; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  OXPHOS-dependent metabolic reprogramming prompts metastatic potential of breast cancer cells under osteogenic differentiation.

Authors:  Yangling Hu; Weimin Xu; Hui Zeng; Zilong He; Xiao Lu; Daming Zuo; Genggeng Qin; Weiguo Chen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.