Literature DB >> 17054007

Guiding navigation in colonoscopy.

C G L Cao1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonrigid environments such as the human colon present unique challenges for the navigator in maintaining spatial orientation. Conventional wisdom suggests that a navigational aid, similar to a map, that provides critical shape information would be useful. This article presents a design concept for a colonoscopy navigational aid and the results of an experiment conducted to evaluate the display for supporting navigation and spatial orientation in simulated colonoscopy.
METHODS: A navigational aid was designed to present shape information in an augmented reality display. A total of 14 untrained subjects performed a colonoscopy procedure in rigid and nonrigid colon models, with and without the navigational aid display, in a Latin square design. Performance measures such as time, distance or efficiency of travel, and location and direction error were recorded, together with subjective measures of confidence and workload.
RESULTS: The results showed that, unlike navigating in rigid environments, the subjects spent more time navigating in the nonrigid environment (p < 0.01) and traveled a longer total distance (p = 0.01). The navigational aid had no effect on performance, as compared with the no aid condition. However, subjective measures showed that the subjects were more confident about their determination of location and direction (p < 0.01). They also preferred having the aid during navigation.
CONCLUSION: A navigational aid or map that provides shape information does not seem to improve performance in colonoscopy. In fact, it may lead to a false sense of security about location and orientation in the colon. The value of a map for training purposes remains to be examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17054007     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9000-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  10 in total

1.  Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States.

Authors:  D A Lieberman; P L De Garmo; D E Fleischer; G M Eisen; M Helfand
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Wireless capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  G Iddan; G Meron; A Glukhovsky; P Swain
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The development of the swallowable video capsule (M2A).

Authors:  G D Meron
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning.

Authors:  T Mahmood; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Virtual colonoscopy--promising, but not ready for widespread use.

Authors:  J H Bond
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Gastrointestinal capsule endoscopy: from tertiary centres to primary care.

Authors:  Reena Sidhu; David S Sanders; Mark E McAlindon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-04

7.  A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J C Brooker; B P Saunders; S G Shah; C B Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Fluoroscopy. A valuable ally during difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  W C Cirocco; L C Rusin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers.

Authors:  S G Shah; B P Saunders; J C Brooker; C B Williams
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  First clinical results with a real time, electronic imager as an aid to colonoscopy.

Authors:  B P Saunders; G D Bell; C B Williams; J S Bladen; A P Anderson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 23.059

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Workload assessment of surgeons: correlation between NASA TLX and blinks.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Xianta Jiang; Geoffrey Tien; Adam Meneghetti; O Neely M Panton; M Stella Atkins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Measuring mental workload during the performance of advanced laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Maria A Cassera; Danny V Martinec; Georg O Spaun; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.