Literature DB >> 17050065

Errors in interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures.

Kenneth H Rand1, Maria Tillan.   

Abstract

We reviewed major errors in Gram stain reports from positive blood cultures to identify patterns and potential clinical impact. During a 23-month period, blood cultures were misread for 57 (0.7%) of 8,253 patients. Of 5,885 read as gram-positive cocci, 6 (0.1%) had only gram-negative organisms by culture, 3 of which were Acinetobacter species Of 1,959 read as gram-negative bacilli, 25 (1.3%) had only gram-positive organisms by culture. Of these, 9 were Bacillus and 2 were Clostridium species. Nonrecognition of mixed Gram stains accounted for 28 errors that most often were associated with a reading of gram-positive cocci. In 4 cases, there were delays of 14 hours to 3 days in starting appropriate antibiotic treatment; 2 deaths occurred, although the erroneous Gram stain report probably was not contributory. Pathologists and laboratory personnel need to be aware of these types of misinterpretations and the potential effects on patient outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17050065     DOI: 10.1309/V4KE2FPM5T8V4552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  12 in total

1.  Multicenter Assessment of Gram Stain Error Rates.

Authors:  Linoj P Samuel; Joan-Miquel Balada-Llasat; Amanda Harrington; Robert Cavagnolo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  First notification of positive blood cultures and the high accuracy of the gram stain report.

Authors:  Mette Søgaard; Mette Nørgaard; Henrik C Schønheyder
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  One Small Step for the Gram Stain, One Giant Leap for Clinical Microbiology.

Authors:  Richard B Thomson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Gram Staining: a Comparison of Two Automated Systems and Manual Staining.

Authors:  Neele J Froböse; Sara Bjedov; Franziska Schuler; Barbara C Kahl; Stefanie Kampmeier; Frieder Schaumburg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Automated Interpretation of Blood Culture Gram Stains by Use of a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Kenneth P Smith; Anthony D Kang; James E Kirby
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Waltzing around Sacred Cows on the Way to the Future.

Authors:  Stephen M Brecher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Multicenter evaluation of the Staphylococcus QuickFISH method for simultaneous identification of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci directly from blood culture bottles in less than 30 minutes.

Authors:  Melissa K Deck; Erica S Anderson; Rebecca J Buckner; Georgia Colasante; James M Coull; Benjamin Crystal; Phyllis Della Latta; Martin Fuchs; Deanna Fuller; Will Harris; Kevin Hazen; Lisa L Klimas; Daniel Lindao; Michelle C Meltzer; Margie Morgan; Janeen Shepard; Sharon Stevens; Fann Wu; Mark J Fiandaca
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Internal quality assurance in diagnostic microbiology: A simple approach for insightful data.

Authors:  Valentin Scherz; Christian Durussel; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Is Lactobacillus Gram-Positive? A Case Study of Lactobacillus iners.

Authors:  Hyaekang Kim; Taehyun Kim; Jaeku Kang; Younghoon Kim; Heebal Kim
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-06-29

10.  Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Jennifer L Reid; Adam Thornberg; Natalie N Whitfield; Deirdre Trainor; Shawna Lewis; Teresa Wakefield; Thomas E Davis; Keisha G Church; Linoj Samuel; Ray Mills; Patricia Jim; Stephen Young; Frederick S Nolte
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.