Literature DB >> 26888900

Multicenter Assessment of Gram Stain Error Rates.

Linoj P Samuel1, Joan-Miquel Balada-Llasat2, Amanda Harrington3, Robert Cavagnolo4.   

Abstract

Gram stains remain the cornerstone of diagnostic testing in the microbiology laboratory for the guidance of empirical treatment prior to availability of culture results. Incorrectly interpreted Gram stains may adversely impact patient care, and yet there are no comprehensive studies that have evaluated the reliability of the technique and there are no established standards for performance. In this study, clinical microbiology laboratories at four major tertiary medical care centers evaluated Gram stain error rates across all nonblood specimen types by using standardized criteria. The study focused on several factors that primarily contribute to errors in the process, including poor specimen quality, smear preparation, and interpretation of the smears. The number of specimens during the evaluation period ranged from 976 to 1,864 specimens per site, and there were a total of 6,115 specimens. Gram stain results were discrepant from culture for 5% of all specimens. Fifty-eight percent of discrepant results were specimens with no organisms reported on Gram stain but significant growth on culture, while 42% of discrepant results had reported organisms on Gram stain that were not recovered in culture. Upon review of available slides, 24% (63/263) of discrepant results were due to reader error, which varied significantly based on site (9% to 45%). The Gram stain error rate also varied between sites, ranging from 0.4% to 2.7%. The data demonstrate a significant variability between laboratories in Gram stain performance and affirm the need for ongoing quality assessment by laboratories. Standardized monitoring of Gram stains is an essential quality control tool for laboratories and is necessary for the establishment of a quality benchmark across laboratories.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26888900      PMCID: PMC4879281          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.03066-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  30 in total

1.  Error detection in anatomic pathology.

Authors:  Richard J Zarbo; Frederick A Meier; Stephen S Raab
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  First notification of positive blood cultures and the high accuracy of the gram stain report.

Authors:  Mette Søgaard; Mette Nørgaard; Henrik C Schønheyder
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Mechanisms to assess Gram stain interpretation proficiency of technologists at satellite laboratories.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Timothy Block; Janice Basile; Jeanne E Hryciuk; Ronald F Schell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Impact of reporting gram stain results from blood culture bottles on the selection of antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  Yuki Uehara; Michiko Yagoshi; Yumiko Tanimichi; Hiroko Yamada; Kazuo Shimoguchi; Sachiyo Yamamoto; Mitsuru Yanai; Kazunari Kumasaka
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 5.  Study of amended reports to evaluate and improve surgical pathology processes.

Authors:  Frederick A Meier; Ruan C Varney; Richard J Zarbo
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.875

6.  Sputum gram's stain in community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  W W Reed; G S Byrd; R H Gates; R S Howard; M J Weaver
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-10

Review 7.  The role of the clinical laboratory in the future of health care: lean microbiology.

Authors:  Linoj Samuel; Susan Novak-Weekley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Errors in interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Kenneth H Rand; Maria Tillan
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Concentrated gram stain smears prepared with a cytospin centrifuge.

Authors:  C J Shanholtzer; P J Schaper; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care.

Authors:  John T James
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  18 in total

1.  One Small Step for the Gram Stain, One Giant Leap for Clinical Microbiology.

Authors:  Richard B Thomson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Gram Staining: a Comparison of Two Automated Systems and Manual Staining.

Authors:  Neele J Froböse; Sara Bjedov; Franziska Schuler; Barbara C Kahl; Stefanie Kampmeier; Frieder Schaumburg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Automated Interpretation of Blood Culture Gram Stains by Use of a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Kenneth P Smith; Anthony D Kang; James E Kirby
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Waltzing around Sacred Cows on the Way to the Future.

Authors:  Stephen M Brecher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Development of a Machine learning image segmentation-based algorithm for the determination of the adequacy of Gram-stained sputum smear images.

Authors:  Manraj Sirohi; Mahima Lall; Swapna Yenishetti; Lakshmi Panat; Ajai Kumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-11-28

Review 6.  Image analysis and artificial intelligence in infectious disease diagnostics.

Authors:  K P Smith; J E Kirby
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2020-03-22       Impact factor: 8.067

7.  The Need for Dedicated Microbiology Leadership in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Linoj P Samuel; Glen T Hansen; Colleen S Kraft; Bobbi S Pritt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Internal quality assurance in diagnostic microbiology: A simple approach for insightful data.

Authors:  Valentin Scherz; Christian Durussel; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sequelae of Fetal Infection in a Non-human Primate Model of Listeriosis.

Authors:  Bryce Wolfe; Andrea R Kerr; Andres Mejia; Heather A Simmons; Charles J Czuprynski; Thaddeus G Golos
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 10.  The tridecaptins: non-ribosomal peptides that selectively target Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Samantha J Bann; Ross D Ballantine; Stephen A Cochrane
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2021-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.