Literature DB >> 22493336

Multicenter evaluation of the Staphylococcus QuickFISH method for simultaneous identification of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci directly from blood culture bottles in less than 30 minutes.

Melissa K Deck1, Erica S Anderson, Rebecca J Buckner, Georgia Colasante, James M Coull, Benjamin Crystal, Phyllis Della Latta, Martin Fuchs, Deanna Fuller, Will Harris, Kevin Hazen, Lisa L Klimas, Daniel Lindao, Michelle C Meltzer, Margie Morgan, Janeen Shepard, Sharon Stevens, Fann Wu, Mark J Fiandaca.   

Abstract

A novel rapid peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method, Staphylococcus QuickFISH, for the direct detection of Staphylococcus species from positive blood culture bottles was evaluated in a multicenter clinical study. The method utilizes a microscope slide with predeposited positive- and negative-control organisms and a self-reporting 15-min hybridization step, which eliminates the need for a wash step. Five clinical laboratories tested 722 positive blood culture bottles containing gram-positive cocci in clusters. The sensitivities for detection of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were 99.5% (217/218) and 98.8% (487/493), respectively, and the combined specificity of the assay was 89.5% (17/19). The combined positive and negative predictive values of the assay were 99.7% (696/698) and 70.8% (17/24), respectively. Studies were also performed on spiked cultures to establish the specificity and performance sensitivity of the method. Staphylococcus QuickFISH has a turnaround time (TAT) of <30 min and a hands-on time (HOT) of <5 min. The ease and speed of the method have the potential to improve the accuracy of therapeutic intervention by providing S. aureus/CoNS identification simultaneously with Gram stain results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22493336      PMCID: PMC3372102          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00225-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  22 in total

1.  Impact of rapid in situ hybridization testing on coagulase-negative staphylococci positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Graeme N Forrest; Sanjay Mehta; Elizabeth Weekes; Durry P Lincalis; Jennifer K Johnson; Richard A Venezia
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Thermostable DNase is superior to tube coagulase for direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus in positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; Michelle J Alfa; Kanchana Manickam; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results.

Authors:  D W Bates; L Goldman; T H Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Identification of indicator microorganisms using a standardized PNA FISH method.

Authors:  H Perry-O'Keefe; S Rigby; K Oliveira; D Sørensen; H Stender; J Coull; J J Hyldig-Nielsen
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.363

5.  The burden of Staphylococcus aureus infections on hospitals in the United States: an analysis of the 2000 and 2001 Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.

Authors:  Gary A Noskin; Robert J Rubin; Jerome J Schentag; Jan Kluytmans; Edwin C Hedblom; Maartje Smulders; Elizabeth Lapetina; Eric Gemmen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005 Aug 8-22

6.  Determining the clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures.

Authors:  Susan E Beekmann; Daniel J Diekema; Gary V Doern
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Errors in interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Kenneth H Rand; Maria Tillan
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus directly from blood cultures by fluorescence in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid probes.

Authors:  Kenneth Oliveira; Gary W Procop; Deborah Wilson; James Coull; Henrik Stender
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  An evaluation of the advandx Staphylococcus aureus/CNS PNA FISH assay.

Authors:  Donna M Hensley; Rachel Tapia; Yadira Encina
Journal:  Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2009

10.  Laboratory-based surveillance of current antimicrobial resistance patterns and trends among Staphylococcus aureus: 2005 status in the United States.

Authors:  David Styers; Daniel J Sheehan; Patricia Hogan; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 3.944

View more
  18 in total

1.  Clinical consequences of using PNA-FISH in Staphylococcal bacteraemia.

Authors:  R R Laub; J D Knudsen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Evaluation of three rapid diagnostic methods for direct identification of microorganisms in positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Raquel M Martinez; Elizabeth R Bauerle; Ferric C Fang; Susan M Butler-Wu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Emerging technologies for rapid identification of bloodstream pathogens.

Authors:  Atul Kothari; Margie Morgan; David A Haake
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Effects of antimicrobial peptides on Staphylococcus aureus growth and biofilm formation in vitro following isolation from implant-associated infections.

Authors:  Guangfeng Zhao; Huiming Zhong; Mao Zhang; Yucai Hong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

Review 5.  New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Michael Davenport; Kathleen E Mach; Linda M Dairiki Shortliffe; Niaz Banaei; Tza-Huei Wang; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Optimizing peptide nucleic acid probes for hybridization-based detection and identification of bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Kathleen E Mach; Aniruddha M Kaushik; Kuangwen Hsieh; Pak Kin Wong; Tza-Huei Wang; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 7.  Current approaches to the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Patrick R Murray; Henry Masur
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Impact of QuickFISH in addition to antimicrobial stewardship on vancomycin use and resource utilization in cancer patients with coagulase-negative staphylococcal blood cultures.

Authors:  S K Seo; Z Gedrimaite; A Paskovaty; K Seier; S Morjaria; N Cohen; E Riedel; Y W Tang; N E Babady
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 8.067

9.  Comparison of the Staphylococcus QuickFISH BC test with the tube coagulase test performed on positive blood cultures for evaluation and application in a clinical routine setting.

Authors:  E Carretto; M Bardaro; G Russello; M Mirra; C Zuelli; D Barbarini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  An international, prospective, multicenter evaluation of the combination of AdvanDx Staphylococcus QuickFISH BC with mecA XpressFISH for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from positive blood cultures.

Authors:  H Salimnia; M R Fairfax; P Lephart; M Morgan; J J Gilbreath; S M Butler-Wu; K E Templeton; F J Hamilton; F Wu; R Buckner; D Fuller; T E Davis; A M Abdelhamed; M R Jacobs; A Miller; B Pfrommer; K C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.