Literature DB >> 8007832

Regressive eye movements and sentence parsing: on the use of regression-contingent analyses.

K Rayner1, S C Sereno.   

Abstract

Altmann, Garnham, and Dennis (1992) recently advocated the use of a regression-contingent analysis in eye movement studies dealing with parsing of sentences containing temporary structural ambiguities. Using experimental sentences preceded by referentially supportive contexts, they demonstrated a different pattern of results when regressive eye movements were eliminated from the data set than when regressions were included. The regression-contingent analysis that they used involves an implicit assumption that regressive eye movements are a necessary consequence of subjects' being garden pathed. We report some data which demonstrate that garden path effects are sometimes even stronger in the absence of regressions and, thus, argue that readers can be garden pathed without making regressions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8007832     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  5 in total

1.  Discourse influences during parsing are delayed.

Authors:  K Rayner; S Garrod; C A Perfetti
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-11

Review 2.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.

Authors:  F Ferreira; J M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing.

Authors:  G Altmann; M Steedman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-12

5.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.

Authors:  J C Trueswell; M K Tanenhaus; C Kello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.051

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Overt reanalysis strategies and eye movements during the reading of mild garden path sentences.

Authors:  Enrique Meseguer; Manuel Carreiras; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

2.  Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Charles Clifton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Heavy NP shift is the parser's last resort: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  The return of the repressed: Abandoned parses facilitate syntactic reanalysis.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading.

Authors:  Guojie Ma; Xingshan Li; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Stress Matters: Effects of Anticipated Lexical Stress on Silent Reading.

Authors:  Mara Breen; Charles Clifton
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Stress matters revisited: a boundary change experiment.

Authors:  Mara Breen; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.143

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.