Literature DB >> 18055882

Extracting information from hospital records: what patients think about consent.

Bruce Campbell1, Helen Thomson, Jessica Slater, Colin Coward, Katrina Wyatt, Kieran Sweeney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: There is increasing regulation and concern about the use of material from patients' records. Studies on patients' views have focused on primary care and on use of material for research. This study investigated patients' preferences about whether and how doctors should seek permission for use of specified items of anonymised information from their hospital records for clinical audit, teaching, national data collection and research.
METHOD: A specially designed questionnaire sent to recently discharged patients under the care of medical and surgical specialists.
RESULTS: 166/316 (53%) patients completed the questionnaires. The percentage of respondents who "definitely wanted" or "preferred" to be asked for permission for use of anonymised information was highest for medical history (21%) and reasons for treatment (20%). The purpose for which information was requested (eg, research, audit) made little difference to the overall percentages (range 10-12%). 21 (13%) patients "definitely wanted" to be asked for permission for use of some item or proposed use of information--most had no preference or preferred not to be asked. The most popular method for asking permission was signing a form while in hospital, rather than by specific requests later.
CONCLUSIONS: Most hospital patients have no preference or prefer not to be asked permission for doctors to use information from their records. About 1 in 8 patients would like to be asked for permission, some even for clinical audit of outcomes--although a minority, this could compromise thorough clinical audit. Systems for obtaining permission when patients are admitted to hospital need to be considered. Resolution of uncertainties surrounding legislation on the use of information would be helpful to clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18055882      PMCID: PMC2653171          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  23 in total

1.  Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance.

Authors:  Chris Verity; Angus Nicoll
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

2.  Patients, privacy and trust: patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; Joy L Pritts; Michael A Neblo; Rosemarie J Kalarickal; John W Creswell; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information.

Authors:  Richard Whiddett; Inga Hunter; Judith Engelbrecht; Jocelyn Handy
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia.

Authors:  E C Mulligan
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2001-06-18       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Selection bias from requiring patients to give consent to examine data for health services research.

Authors:  S H Woolf; S F Rothemich; R E Johnson; D W Marsland
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

6.  Patient data confidentiality and patient rights.

Authors:  B Sadan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Patients' opinions on privacy, consent and the disclosure of health information for medical research.

Authors:  Stacey A Page; Ian Mitchell
Journal:  Chronic Dis Can       Date:  2006

8.  The Patient Information Advisory Group and the use of patient-identifiable data.

Authors:  Joan Higgins
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2003-07

9.  Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study.

Authors:  M R Robling; K Hood; H Houston; R Pill; J Fay; H M Evans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Requiring consent vs. waiving consent for medical records research: a Minnesota law vs. the U.S. (HIPAA) privacy rule.

Authors:  Beverly Woodward; Dale Hammerschmidt
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-09
View more
  14 in total

1.  'Never heard of it'- understanding the public's lack of awareness of a new electronic patient record.

Authors:  Tanja Bratan; Katja Stramer; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Sorry, You Can't Have That Information: Data Holder Confusion Regarding Privacy Requirements for Personal Health Information and the Potential Chilling Effect on Health Research.

Authors:  Daryl Pullman; Sharon K Buehler; Larry Felt; Katherine Gallagher; Jeannie House; T Montgomery Keough; Lucy McDonald; Angela Power; Ann Ryan
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-05

3.  The establishment of an ISO compliant cancer biobank for Jordan and its neighboring countries through knowledge transfer and training.

Authors:  Martin Barr; Lina Souan; Peadar MacGabhann; Jeanette Müller; Maxim Al Ashhab; Mohammed Jasser; Khetam Hamza; Sallam Al Hassoon; Uwe Kuhn; Daniela Infante; Denise Lawlor; Kathy Gately; Eyad Amireh; Kenneth O'Byrne; Maher A Sughayer
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.

Authors:  Fiona Riordan; Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Julie E Reed; Cicely Marston; Derek Bell; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 5.  Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Mhairi Aitken; Jenna de St Jorre; Claudia Pagliari; Ruth Jepson; Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Eliciting meta consent for future secondary research use of health data using a smartphone application - a proof of concept study in the Danish population.

Authors:  Thomas Ploug; Søren Holm
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Developing a UK registry to investigate the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients who activate the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) pathway: a multicentre, feasibility study linking routinely collected electronic patient data.

Authors:  Rachel C Brierley; Maria Pufulete; Jessica Harris; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; John P Greenwood; Stephen Dorman; Richard Anderson; Chris A Rogers; Barnaby C Reeves
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  "Let's get the best quality research we can": public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Hill; Emma L Turner; Richard M Martin; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  The acceptability of conducting data linkage research without obtaining consent: lay people's views and justifications.

Authors:  Vicki Xafis
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Patient and public views on electronic health records and their uses in the United kingdom: cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Serena A Luchenski; Julie E Reed; Cicely Marston; Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Azeem Majeed; Derek Bell
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.