Literature DB >> 17041690

Experience with the Edwards MIRA mechanical bileaflet valve in the aortic and mitral positions.

Arzum Kale1, Ulku Yildiz, Benhur Can, Ozer Kandemir, Hilmi Tokmakoglu, Tevfik Tezcaner, Yaman Zorlutuna.   

Abstract

The Edwards MIRA bileaflet mechanical prosthesis, a heart valve not yet available in the United States, is designed with a unique hinge mechanism, curved leaflets, and thin titanium housing. We performed this study to investigate its clinical performance and postoperative hemodynamic results. We implanted 58 Edwards MIRA prostheses in 51 patients in the aortic (n = 18), mitral (n = 26), and aortic and mitral (n = 7) positions. Patients' ages ranged from 25 to 84 years (mean age, 53.7 +/- 13.6). Operative mortality was 2% (n = 1), and late mortality was 4% (n = 2). Thromboembolic events were observed in 2 patients (valve thrombosis in 1 and a cerebrovascular event in 1). There were no complications related to anticoagulation. No signs of valvular dysfunction or paravalvular leakage were observed. Peak transvalvular gradients of the aortic prostheses ranged from 24.25 +/- 5.32 mmHg for the 21-mm valve to 11 +/- 1.41 mmHg for the 25-mm valve. The effective orifice area ranged from 1.99 +/- 0.12 cm2 for the 21-mm valve to 2.44 +/- 0.17 cm2 for the 25-mm valve. The mean transvalvular gradients of the mitral prostheses ranged from 5.85 +/- 2.91 mmHg for the 27-mm valve to 4.5 +/- 0 mmHg for the 31-mm valve. The effective orifice area ranged from 2.31 +/- 0.03 cm2 for the 27-mm valve to 2.64 +/- 0.05 cm2 for the 33-mm valve. These preliminary data suggest good hemodynamic function and a low rate of valve-related complications in the use of the Edwards MIRA mechanical prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17041690      PMCID: PMC1592271     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  7 in total

1.  The Edwards MIRA heart valve prosthesis: a 2-year study.

Authors:  Rudolf Driever; Stefan Fuchs; Markus Meissner; Edgar Schmitz; Herbert O Vetter
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.620

2.  Multiple mechanical valve replacement surgery comparison of St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics prostheses.

Authors:  W R Jamieson; A I Munro; R T Miyagishima; G L Grunkemeier; L H Burr; S V Lichtenstein; G F Tyers
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis: an analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors.

Authors:  L F Debétaz; P Ruchat; M Hurni; A Fischer; F Stumpe; H Sadeghi; G van Melle; J J Goy
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Initial clinical and hemodynamic experience with Edwards MIRA mechanical bileaflet valve.

Authors:  M De Feo; A Renzulli; F Onorati; A Della Corte; G Dialetto; F E Covino; M Cotrufo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.888

5.  Bileaflet mechanical prostheses performance in mitral position.

Authors:  W R Jamieson; R T Miyagishima; G L Grunkemeier; E Germann; C Henderson; G J Fradet; L H Burr; S V Lichtenstein
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Five-year follow-up after heart valve replacement with the CarboMedics bileaflet prosthesis.

Authors:  S M Rödler; A Moritz; W Schreiner; A End; P Dubsky; E Wolner
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Sorin Bicarbon bileaflet valve: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  J B Borman; C De Riberolles
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.191

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.