OBJECTIVE: The experience with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) and CarboMedics (CM) bileaflet mechanical prostheses was evaluated to determine thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications and predictive risk factors. METHODS: From 1989 to 1994, a total of 246 patients had multiple valve replacement (SJM, 140; CM, 106); concomitant procedures 20.3% (50) [coronary artery bypass 10.6% (26)] and 53.7% (132) previous cardiac surgery, primarily valve replacement procedures. The pre-operative variables [coronary artery disease, previous cardiovascular surgery, concomitant procedures, valve lesion (except mitral stenosis), status, atrial fibrillation, and NYHA III/IV] did not distinguish the prosthesis-type (pNS). RESULTS: The prosthesis-type and the pre-operative variables, including atrial fibrillation, were not predictive of overall thromboembolism (TE). The linearized rate of total TE events for overall multiple replacements (MR) was 5.4%/patient-year (minor, 2.52; major 2.85); the total TE for CM and SJM was 5.4%/patient-year, respectively. The < or = 30 day major TE crude rate was 0.82%, while the > 30 day major event rate was 2.7%/patient-year. Of the total (major and minor) TE events 100% (3) of < or = 30 days and 72% (29), > 30 days had an INR < 2.5 at or immediately prior to the event. The thrombosis rate (included in total TE events) was 0.67%/patient-year (4 events, 100% INR < 2.5). Of the various TE event categories the prosthesis-types (CM and SJM) were not differentiated (pNS). The freedom, at 5 years, from major/fatal TE, thrombosis and hemorrhage from anticoagulation was 89.3 +/- 3.8% for CM and 87.9 +/- 3.7% for SJM and, 91.3 +/- 3.5% and 89.3 +/- 3.7%, respectively, (pNS) exclusive of early events. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical prostheses in multiple valve replacement surgery in this non-randomized prospective study revealed no significant differences in performance with regard to thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications.
OBJECTIVE: The experience with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) and CarboMedics (CM) bileaflet mechanical prostheses was evaluated to determine thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications and predictive risk factors. METHODS: From 1989 to 1994, a total of 246 patients had multiple valve replacement (SJM, 140; CM, 106); concomitant procedures 20.3% (50) [coronary artery bypass 10.6% (26)] and 53.7% (132) previous cardiac surgery, primarily valve replacement procedures. The pre-operative variables [coronary artery disease, previous cardiovascular surgery, concomitant procedures, valve lesion (except mitral stenosis), status, atrial fibrillation, and NYHA III/IV] did not distinguish the prosthesis-type (pNS). RESULTS: The prosthesis-type and the pre-operative variables, including atrial fibrillation, were not predictive of overall thromboembolism (TE). The linearized rate of total TE events for overall multiple replacements (MR) was 5.4%/patient-year (minor, 2.52; major 2.85); the total TE for CM and SJM was 5.4%/patient-year, respectively. The < or = 30 day major TE crude rate was 0.82%, while the > 30 day major event rate was 2.7%/patient-year. Of the total (major and minor) TE events 100% (3) of < or = 30 days and 72% (29), > 30 days had an INR < 2.5 at or immediately prior to the event. The thrombosis rate (included in total TE events) was 0.67%/patient-year (4 events, 100% INR < 2.5). Of the various TE event categories the prosthesis-types (CM and SJM) were not differentiated (pNS). The freedom, at 5 years, from major/fatal TE, thrombosis and hemorrhage from anticoagulation was 89.3 +/- 3.8% for CM and 87.9 +/- 3.7% for SJM and, 91.3 +/- 3.5% and 89.3 +/- 3.7%, respectively, (pNS) exclusive of early events. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical prostheses in multiple valve replacement surgery in this non-randomized prospective study revealed no significant differences in performance with regard to thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications.