Literature DB >> 17040146

Psychometric characteristics of a quality of communication questionnaire assessing communication about end-of-life care.

Ruth Engelberg1, Lois Downey, J Randall Curtis.   

Abstract

The importance of good clinician-patient communication to quality end-of-life care has been well documented yet there are no validated measures that allow patients to assess the quality of this communication. Using a sample of hospice patients (n = 83) and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 113), we evaluated the psychometric characteristics of a 13-item patient-centered, patient-report questionnaire about the quality of end-of-life communication (QOC). Our purpose was to explore the measurement structure of the QOC items to ascertain if the items represent unitary or multidimensional constructs and to describe the construct validity of the QOC score(s). Analyses included: principal component analyses to identify scales, internal consistency analyses to demonstrate reliability, and correlational and group comparisons to support construct validity. Findings support the construction of two scales: a six-item "general communication skills" scale and a seven-item, "communication about end-of-life care" scale. The two scales meet standards of scale measurement, including good factor convergence (values >or= 0.63) and discrimination (values different >or= 0.25), percent of variance explained (69.3%), and good internal consistency (alpha >or= 0.79). The scales' construct validity is supported by significant associations (p <or= 0.01) with items assessing overall quality of doctor communication and quality of care, number and type of end-of-life discussions, and doctor's awareness of patient's treatment preferences. The general communication skills scale correlates more strongly with the general communication items while the communication about end-of-life care scale correlates more strongly with items addressing end-of-life topics. While further validation studies are needed, this assessment of the QOC represents an important step toward providing a measure of the quality of end-of-life communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17040146     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  63 in total

1.  Internal medicine trainee self-assessments of end-of-life communication skills do not predict assessments of patients, families, or clinician-evaluators.

Authors:  Robert P Dickson; Ruth A Engelberg; Anthony L Back; Dee W Ford; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Effect of a disease-specific planning intervention on surrogate understanding of patient goals for future medical treatment.

Authors:  Karin T Kirchhoff; Bernard J Hammes; Karen A Kehl; Linda A Briggs; Roger L Brown
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  End-of-Life Decision Making and Communication of Bereaved Family Members of African Americans with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Esther R Smith-Howell; Susan E Hickman; Salimah H Meghani; Susan M Perkins; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Did a Goals-of-Care Discussion Happen? Differences in the Occurrence of Goals-of-Care Discussions as Reported by Patients, Clinicians, and in the Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Matthew E Modes; Ruth A Engelberg; Lois Downey; Elizabeth L Nielsen; J Randall Curtis; Erin K Kross
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Patient-clinician communication: associations with important health outcomes among veterans with COPD.

Authors:  Christopher G Slatore; Laura M Cecere; Lynn F Reinke; Linda Ganzini; Edmunds M Udris; Brianna R Moss; Chris L Bryson; J Randall Curtis; David H Au
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  A randomized trial to improve communication about end-of-life care among patients with COPD.

Authors:  David H Au; Edmunds M Udris; Ruth A Engelberg; Paula H Diehr; Christopher L Bryson; Lynn F Reinke; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Development and testing of a decision aid on goals of care for advanced dementia.

Authors:  Seth F Einterz; Robin Gilliam; Feng Chang Lin; J Marvin McBride; Laura C Hanson
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.669

8.  Fidelity to a behavioral intervention to improve goals of care decisions for nursing home residents with advanced dementia.

Authors:  Laura C Hanson; Mi-Kyung Song; Sheryl Zimmerman; Robin Gilliam; Cherie Rosemond; Latarsha Chisholm; Feng-Chang Lin
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  End-of-Life Discussions in Patients With Heart Failure.

Authors:  Kathleen A Young; Margaret M Redfield; Jacob J Strand; Shannon M Dunlay
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 5.712

10.  Perceptions of Family Decision-makers of Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia Regarding the Quality of Communication Around End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Mark Toles; Mi-Kyung Song; Feng-Chang Lin; Laura C Hanson
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.669

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.