David H Au1, Edmunds M Udris2, Ruth A Engelberg3, Paula H Diehr4, Christopher L Bryson5, Lynn F Reinke2, J Randall Curtis3. 1. Health Services Research and Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: David.Au@VA.gov. 2. Health Services Research and Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Health Services, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 5. Health Services Research and Development, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Patients with COPD consistently express a desire to discuss end-of-life care with clinicians, but these discussions rarely occur. We assessed whether an intervention using patient-specific feedback about preferences for discussing end-of-life care would improve the occurrence and quality of communication between patients with COPD and their clinicians. METHODS: We performed a cluster-randomized trial of clinicians and patients from the outpatient clinics at the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System. Using self-reported questionnaires, we assessed patients' preferences for communication, life-sustaining therapy, and experiences at the end of life. The intervention clinicians and patients received a one-page patient-specific feedback form, based on questionnaire responses, to stimulate conversations. The control group completed questionnaires but did not receive feedback. Patient-reported occurrence and quality of end-of-life communication (QOC) were assessed within 2 weeks of a targeted visit. Intention-to-treat regression analyses were performed with generalized estimating equations to account for clustering of patients within clinicians. RESULTS:Ninety-two clinicians contributed 376 patients. Patients in the intervention arm reported nearly a threefold higher rate of discussions about end-of-life care (unadjusted, 30% vs 11%; P < .001). Baseline end-of-life communication was poor (intervention group QOC score, 23.3; 95% CI, 19.9-26.8; control QOC score, 19.2; 95% CI, 15.9-22.4). Patients in the intervention arm reported higher-quality end-of-life communication that was statistically significant, although the overall improvement was small (Cohen effect size, 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: A one-page patient-specific feedback form about preferences for end-of-life care and communication improved the occurrence and quality of communication from patients' perspectives. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00106080; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE:Patients with COPD consistently express a desire to discuss end-of-life care with clinicians, but these discussions rarely occur. We assessed whether an intervention using patient-specific feedback about preferences for discussing end-of-life care would improve the occurrence and quality of communication between patients with COPD and their clinicians. METHODS: We performed a cluster-randomized trial of clinicians and patients from the outpatient clinics at the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System. Using self-reported questionnaires, we assessed patients' preferences for communication, life-sustaining therapy, and experiences at the end of life. The intervention clinicians and patients received a one-page patient-specific feedback form, based on questionnaire responses, to stimulate conversations. The control group completed questionnaires but did not receive feedback. Patient-reported occurrence and quality of end-of-life communication (QOC) were assessed within 2 weeks of a targeted visit. Intention-to-treat regression analyses were performed with generalized estimating equations to account for clustering of patients within clinicians. RESULTS: Ninety-two clinicians contributed 376 patients. Patients in the intervention arm reported nearly a threefold higher rate of discussions about end-of-life care (unadjusted, 30% vs 11%; P < .001). Baseline end-of-life communication was poor (intervention group QOC score, 23.3; 95% CI, 19.9-26.8; control QOC score, 19.2; 95% CI, 15.9-22.4). Patients in the intervention arm reported higher-quality end-of-life communication that was statistically significant, although the overall improvement was small (Cohen effect size, 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: A one-page patient-specific feedback form about preferences for end-of-life care and communication improved the occurrence and quality of communication from patients' perspectives. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00106080; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Authors: M T Claessens; J Lynn; Z Zhong; N A Desbiens; R S Phillips; A W Wu; F E Harrell; A F Connors Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Bartolome R Celli; Claudia G Cote; Jose M Marin; Ciro Casanova; Maria Montes de Oca; Reina A Mendez; Victor Pinto Plata; Howard J Cabral Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-03-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew E Modes; Ruth A Engelberg; Lois Downey; Elizabeth L Nielsen; J Randall Curtis; Erin K Kross Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Lynn F Reinke; Laura C Feemster; Jennifer McDowell; Eric Gunnink; Erica V Tartaglione; Edmunds Udris; J Randall Curtis; David H Au Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2017 Jan - Feb Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: Mara R Hobler; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis; Kathleen J Ramos; Miriam I Zander; Shacole S Howard; Christopher H Goss; Moira L Aitken Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Teresa L Hagan; Susan M Cohen; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Kristin Zorn; Clement A Stone; Heidi S Donovan Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 3.187