Mark Toles1, Mi-Kyung Song2, Feng-Chang Lin3, Laura C Hanson4. 1. School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: mtoles@email.unc.edu. 2. Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 3. Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: (1) Compare family decision-makers' perceptions of quality of communication with nursing home (NH) staff (nurses and social workers) and clinicians (physicians and other advanced practitioners) for persons with advanced dementia; (2) determine the extent to which characteristics of NH residents and family decision-makers are associated with those perceptions. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of baseline data from a cluster randomized trial of the Goals of Care intervention. SETTING:Twenty-two NHs in North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Family decision-makers of NH residents with advanced dementia (n = 302). MEASUREMENTS: During the baseline interviews, family decision-makers rated the quality of general communication and communication specific to end-of-life care using the Quality of Communication Questionnaire (QoC). QoC item scores ranged from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better quality of communication. Linear models were used to compare QoC by NH provider type, and to test for associations of QoC with resident and family characteristics. RESULTS: Family decision-makers rated the QoC with NH staff higher than NH clinicians, including average overall QoC scores (5.5 [1.7] vs 3.7 [3.0], P < .001), general communication subscale scores (8.4 [1.7] vs 5.6 [4.3], P < .001), and end-of-life communication subscale scores (3.0 [2.3] vs 2.0 [2.5], P < .001). Low scores reflected failure to communicate about many aspects of care, particularly end-of-life care. QoC scores were higher with later-stage dementia, but were not associated with the age, gender, race, relationship to the resident, or educational attainment of family decision-makers. CONCLUSION: Although family decision-makers for persons with advanced dementia rated quality communication with NH staff higher than that with clinicians, they reported poor quality end-of-life communication for both staff and clinicians. Clinicians simply did not perform many communication behaviors that contribute to high-quality end-of-life communication. These omissions suggest opportunities to clarify and improve interdisciplinary roles in end-of-life communication for residents with advanced dementia.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: (1) Compare family decision-makers' perceptions of quality of communication with nursing home (NH) staff (nurses and social workers) and clinicians (physicians and other advanced practitioners) for persons with advanced dementia; (2) determine the extent to which characteristics of NH residents and family decision-makers are associated with those perceptions. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of baseline data from a cluster randomized trial of the Goals of Care intervention. SETTING: Twenty-two NHs in North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Family decision-makers of NH residents with advanced dementia (n = 302). MEASUREMENTS: During the baseline interviews, family decision-makers rated the quality of general communication and communication specific to end-of-life care using the Quality of Communication Questionnaire (QoC). QoC item scores ranged from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better quality of communication. Linear models were used to compare QoC by NH provider type, and to test for associations of QoC with resident and family characteristics. RESULTS: Family decision-makers rated the QoC with NH staff higher than NH clinicians, including average overall QoC scores (5.5 [1.7] vs 3.7 [3.0], P < .001), general communication subscale scores (8.4 [1.7] vs 5.6 [4.3], P < .001), and end-of-life communication subscale scores (3.0 [2.3] vs 2.0 [2.5], P < .001). Low scores reflected failure to communicate about many aspects of care, particularly end-of-life care. QoC scores were higher with later-stage dementia, but were not associated with the age, gender, race, relationship to the resident, or educational attainment of family decision-makers. CONCLUSION: Although family decision-makers for persons with advanced dementia rated quality communication with NH staff higher than that with clinicians, they reported poor quality end-of-life communication for both staff and clinicians. Clinicians simply did not perform many communication behaviors that contribute to high-quality end-of-life communication. These omissions suggest opportunities to clarify and improve interdisciplinary roles in end-of-life communication for residents with advanced dementia.
Authors: Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Deborah Lekan-Rutledge; Queen Utley-Smith; Natalie Ammarell; Donald Bailey; Mary L Piven; Kirsten Corazzini; Ruth A Anderson Journal: Health Care Manage Rev Date: 2006 Oct-Dec
Authors: Susan L Mitchell; Joan M Teno; Dan K Kiely; Michele L Shaffer; Richard N Jones; Holly G Prigerson; Ladislav Volicer; Jane L Givens; Mary Beth Hamel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ruth A Anderson; Mark P Toles; Kirsten Corazzini; Reuben R McDaniel; Cathleen Colón-Emeric Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Rebecca E Ryan; Michael Connolly; Natalie K Bradford; Simon Henderson; Anthony Herbert; Lina Schonfeld; Jeanine Young; Josephine I Bothroyd; Amanda Henderson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-07-08
Authors: Michelle Vu; Florentina E Sileanu; Sherrie L Aspinall; Joshua D Niznik; Sydney P Springer; Maria K Mor; Xinhua Zhao; Mary Ersek; Joseph T Hanlon; Walid F Gellad; Loren J Schleiden; Joshua M Thorpe; Carolyn T Thorpe Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Sascha R Bolt; Judith M M Meijers; Jenny T van der Steen; Jos M G A Schols; Sandra M G Zwakhalen Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Melissa J Armstrong; Slande Alliance; Pamela Corsentino; Susan M Maixner; Henry L Paulson; Angela Taylor Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Silvia Gonella; Paola Di Giulio; Alexandra Antal; Nicola Cornally; Peter Martin; Sara Campagna; Valerio Dimonte Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 3.390