Literature DB >> 23002391

Bioinformatics Tools for Mass Spectrometry-Based High-Throughput Quantitative Proteomics Platforms.

Alexey V Nefedov1, Miroslaw J Gilski, Rovshan G Sadygov.   

Abstract

Determining global proteome changes is important for advancing a systems biology view of cellular processes and for discovering biomarkers. Liquid chromatography, coupled to mass spectrometry, has been widely used as a proteomics technique for discovering differentially expressed proteins in biological samples. However, although a large number of high-throughput studies have identified differentially regulated proteins, only a small fraction of these results have been reproduced and independently verified. The use of different approaches to data processing and analyses is among the factors which contribute to inconsistent conclusions. This perspective provides a comprehensive and critical overview of bioinformatics methods for commonly used mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics, employing both stable isotope labeling and label-free approaches. We evaluate the challenges associated with current quantitative proteomics techniques, placing particular emphasis on data analyses. The complexity of processing and interpreting proteomics datasets has become a central issue as sensitivity, mass resolution, mass accuracy and throughput of mass spectrometers have improved. A number of computer programs are available to address these challenges, and are reviewed here. We focus on approaches for signal processing, noise reduction, and methods for protein abundance estimation.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 23002391      PMCID: PMC3448448          DOI: 10.2174/157016411795678020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Proteomics        ISSN: 1570-1646            Impact factor:   0.837


  114 in total

1.  Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation.

Authors:  Y Oda; K Huang; F R Cross; D Cowburn; B T Chait
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Eugene Kolker; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Global analysis of the Deinococcus radiodurans proteome by using accurate mass tags.

Authors:  Mary S Lipton; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic'; Gordon A Anderson; David J Anderson; Deanna L Auberry; John R Battista; Michael J Daly; Jim Fredrickson; Kim K Hixson; Heather Kostandarithes; Christophe Masselon; Lye Meng Markillie; Ronald J Moore; Margaret F Romine; Yufeng Shen; Eric Stritmatter; Nikola Tolic'; Harold R Udseth; Amudhan Venkateswaran; Kwong-Kwok Wong; Rui Zhao; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Novel linear quadrupole ion trap/FT mass spectrometer: performance characterization and use in the comparative analysis of histone H3 post-translational modifications.

Authors:  John E P Syka; Jarrod A Marto; Dina L Bai; Stevan Horning; Michael W Senko; Jae C Schwartz; Beatrix Ueberheide; Benjamin Garcia; Scott Busby; Tara Muratore; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Donald F Hunt
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Regression analysis for comparing protein samples with 16O/18O stable-isotope labeled mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J E Eckel-Passow; A L Oberg; T M Therneau; C J Mason; D W Mahoney; K L Johnson; J E Olson; H R Bergen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  A human proteome detection and quantitation project.

Authors:  N Leigh Anderson; Norman G Anderson; Terry W Pearson; Christoph H Borchers; Amanda G Paulovich; Scott D Patterson; Michael Gillette; Ruedi Aebersold; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  A computational approach to correct arginine-to-proline conversion in quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Park; Lujian Liao; Jin Young Kim; John R Yates
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  i-Tracker: for quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ.

Authors:  Ian P Shadforth; Tom P J Dunkley; Kathryn S Lilley; Conrad Bessant
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Protein abundance profiling of the Escherichia coli cytosol.

Authors:  Yasushi Ishihama; Thorsten Schmidt; Juri Rappsilber; Matthias Mann; F Ulrich Hartl; Michael J Kerner; Dmitrij Frishman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The APEX Quantitative Proteomics Tool: generating protein quantitation estimates from LC-MS/MS proteomics results.

Authors:  John C Braisted; Srilatha Kuntumalla; Christine Vogel; Edward M Marcotte; Alan R Rodrigues; Rong Wang; Shih-Ting Huang; Erik S Ferlanti; Alexander I Saeed; Robert D Fleischmann; Scott N Peterson; Rembert Pieper
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Critical Review of Bottom-Up Proteomics: The Good, the Bad, and the Future of this Field.

Authors:  Emmalyn J Dupree; Madhuri Jayathirtha; Hannah Yorkey; Marius Mihasan; Brindusa Alina Petre; Costel C Darie
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2020-07-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.