Literature DB >> 17035537

Neuronal responses to object images in the macaque inferotemporal cortex at different stimulus discrimination levels.

Wataru Suzuki1, Kenji Matsumoto, Keiji Tanaka.   

Abstract

We can discriminate visual objects at multiple levels, from coarse categorization to individual identification. It is not known how the brain adapts to the varying levels of discrimination required in different behavioral contexts. In the present study, we investigated whether the stimulus selectivity of neuronal responses in the monkey inferotemporal cortex, which is the final unimodal stage in the ventral visual pathway, changes with the varying levels of discrimination required for different task conditions. Responses of each inferotemporal cell to the same set of nine object images were examined in two different task conditions. The task alternated between coarse and fine discriminations in the first experiment, and the rule alternated between categorization and individual object identification in the second experiment. Despite these changes in the task requirements and the resulting differences in the monkeys' behavior, we found that the responses of inferotemporal cells were largely unchanged in both experiments. Our results suggest that representation of object images in the inferotemporal cortex is stable and rather insensitive to these kinds of shifts in behavioral context. Neuronal adaptations to behavioral context may occur downstream of the inferotemporal cortex.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17035537      PMCID: PMC6674708          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1532-06.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  33 in total

1.  The hierarchical organization of decision making in the primate prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  M Sakagami; K Tsutsui
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.304

2.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection.

Authors:  K M O'Craven; P E Downing; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  S Treue; J C Martínez Trujillo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; L Chelazzi; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; T Pasternak; R Desimone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex.

Authors:  Natasha Sigala; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A code for behavioral inhibition on the basis of color, but not motion, in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex of macaque monkey.

Authors:  M Sakagami; J Lauwereyns; M Koizumi; S Kobayashi; O Hikosaka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Chris I Baker; Marlene Behrmann; Carl R Olson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Learning to see faces and objects.

Authors:  Michael J. Tarr; Yi D. Cheng
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex.

Authors:  Y Sugase; S Yamane; S Ueno; K Kawano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  14 in total

1.  Responses to compound objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex: the whole is equal to the sum of the discrete parts.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural selectivity in anterior inferotemporal cortex for morphed photographic images during behavioral classification or fixation.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Bharathi Jagadeesh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Surprising twist on auditory representation. Focus on: "what's that sound? Auditory area CLM encodes stimulus surprise, not intensity or intensity changes".

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stimulus similarity-contingent neural adaptation can be time and cortical area dependent.

Authors:  Bram-Ernst Verhoef; Greet Kayaert; Edit Franko; Joris Vangeneugden; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Swing it to the left, swing it to the right: enacting flexible spatial language using a neurodynamic framework.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Yulia Sandamirskaya; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Object comparison in the lateral intraparietal area.

Authors:  Wei Song Ong; Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Similarity relations in visual search predict rapid visual categorization.

Authors:  Krithika Mohan; S P Arun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Behavioral demand modulates object category representation in the inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Nazli Emadi; Hossein Esteky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Task dependence of visual and category representations in prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices.

Authors:  Jillian L McKee; Maximilian Riesenhuber; Earl K Miller; David J Freedman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  How does the brain solve visual object recognition?

Authors:  James J DiCarlo; Davide Zoccolan; Nicole C Rust
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.