Literature DB >> 28794195

Object comparison in the lateral intraparietal area.

Wei Song Ong1, Koorosh Mirpour1, James W Bisley2,3,4.   

Abstract

We can search for and locate specific objects in our environment by looking for objects with similar features. Object recognition involves stimulus similarity responses in ventral visual areas and task-related responses in prefrontal cortex. We tested whether neurons in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) of posterior parietal cortex could form an intermediary representation, collating information from object-specific similarity map representations to allow general decisions about whether a stimulus matches the object being looked for. We hypothesized that responses to stimuli would correlate with how similar they are to a sample stimulus. When animals compared two peripheral stimuli to a sample at their fovea, the response to the matching stimulus was similar, independent of the sample identity, but the response to the nonmatch depended on how similar it was to the sample: the more similar, the greater the response to the nonmatch stimulus. These results could not be explained by task difficulty or confidence. We propose that LIP uses its known mechanistic properties to integrate incoming visual information, including that from the ventral stream about object identity, to create a dynamic representation that is concise, low dimensional, and task relevant and that signifies the choice priorities in mental matching behavior.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Studies in object recognition have focused on the ventral stream, in which neurons respond as a function of how similar a stimulus is to their preferred stimulus, and on prefrontal cortex, where neurons indicate which stimulus is being looked for. We found that parietal area LIP uses its known mechanistic properties to form an intermediary representation in this process. This creates a perceptual similarity map that can be used to guide decisions in prefrontal areas.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dorsal stream; object recognition; parietal cortex; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28794195      PMCID: PMC5646194          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00400.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  57 in total

1.  Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex.

Authors:  Natasha Sigala; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Neural representation for object recognition in inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Sidney R Lehky; Keiji Tanaka
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Neural correlates of attention and distractibility in the lateral intraparietal area.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Remapping, Spatial Stability, and Temporal Continuity: From the Pre-Saccadic to Postsaccadic Representation of Visual Space in LIP.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  How does a brain build a cognitive code?

Authors:  S Grossberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Parietal control of attentional guidance: the significance of sensory, motivational and motor factors.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb; Puiu Balan; Jeff Oristaglio; Mototaka Suzuki
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  The lateral intraparietal area codes the location of saccade targets and not the dimension of the saccades that will be made to acquire them.

Authors:  Sara C Steenrod; Matthew H Phillips; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  4 in total

1.  Parietal-Occipital Interactions Underlying Control- and Representation-Related Processes in Working Memory for Nonspatial Visual Features.

Authors:  Olivia Gosseries; Qing Yu; Joshua J LaRocque; Michael J Starrett; Nathan S Rose; Nelson Cowan; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The roles of the lateral intraparietal area and frontal eye field in guiding eye movements in free viewing search behavior.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.974

3.  The functional roles of neural remapping in cortex.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Koorosh Mirpour; Yelda Alkan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Synchronization between frontal eye field and area V4 during free-gaze visual search.

Authors:  Ting Yan; Hui-Hui Zhou
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2019-09-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.