Literature DB >> 17028792

Severity of vertebral fracture reflects deterioration of bone microarchitecture.

H K Genant1, P D Delmas, P Chen, Y Jiang, E F Eriksen, G P Dalsky, R Marcus, J San Martin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bone microarchitecture, a component of bone strength, is generally measured on transiliac bone biopsy samples. The objective of this study was to determine whether assessment of four grades of vertebral fracture severity could serve as a noninvasive surrogate marker for trabecular bone volume and microarchitecture.
METHODS: Baseline vertebral fracture severity was determined by semiquantitative assessment of spine radiographs from 190 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Bone-structure indices were obtained by 2D histomorphometry and 3D microcomputed tomography (CT) analyses. Significance of differences was determined after adjusting for age, height, and lumbar spine bone mineral density.
RESULTS: There were significant (P < 0.05) trends in decreasing bone volume, trabecular number, and connectivity, and increasing trabecular separation with greater vertebral fracture severity. Histomorphometric bone volume was 25 and 36% lower (P < 0.05) in women with moderate and severe fractures than in women with no fractures, respectively. Compared with women without fractures, women with mild, moderate, and severe fractures had lower (P < 0.05) microCT bone volume (23, 30, and 51%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Microarchitectural deterioration was progressively worse in women with increasing severity of vertebral fractures. We conclude that assessment of vertebral fracture severity is an important clinical tool to evaluate the severity of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17028792     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0199-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  45 in total

1.  Trabecular bone microarchitecture, bone mineral density, and vertebral fractures in male osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Legrand; D Chappard; C Pascaretti; M Duquenne; S Krebs; V Rohmer; M F Basle; M Audran
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Multi-detector row CT imaging of vertebral microstructure for evaluation of fracture risk.

Authors:  Masako Ito; Kyoji Ikeda; Masahiko Nishiguchi; Hiroyuki Shindo; Masataka Uetani; Takayuki Hosoi; Hajime Orimo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Trabecular architecture in women and men of similar bone mass with and without vertebral fracture: I. Two-dimensional histology.

Authors:  L D Hordon; M Raisi; J E Aaron; S K Paxton; M Beneton; J A Kanis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Effects of sex and age on bone microstructure at the ultradistal radius: a population-based noninvasive in vivo assessment.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; B Lawrence Riggs; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Ann L Oberg; Lisa J McDaniel; Margaret Holets; James M Peterson; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Prevalent vertebral deformities predict increased mortality and increased fracture rate in both men and women: a 10-year population-based study of 598 individuals from the Swedish cohort in the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  R Hasserius; M K Karlsson; B E Nilsson; I Redlund-Johnell; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas; L Palermo; M Nevitt; R S Valentin; D Black; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Fractal properties of cancellous bone of the iliac crest in vertebral crush fracture.

Authors:  N L Fazzalari; I H Parkinson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  45 in total

1.  Individual trabecula segmentation (ITS)-based morphological analyses and microfinite element analysis of HR-pQCT images discriminate postmenopausal fragility fractures independent of DXA measurements.

Authors:  X Sherry Liu; Emily M Stein; Bin Zhou; Chiyuan A Zhang; Thomas L Nickolas; Adi Cohen; Valerie Thomas; Donald J McMahon; Felicia Cosman; Jeri Nieves; Elizabeth Shane; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Dynamic bone quality: a noninvasive measure of bone's biomechanical property in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Amit Bhattacharya; Nelson B Watts; Kermit Davis; Susan Kotowski; Rakesh Shukla; Alok Kumar Dwivedi; Robert Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Obesity, bone density relative to body weight and prevalent vertebral fracture at age 62 years: the Newcastle thousand families study.

Authors:  H A Rudman; F Birrell; M S Pearce; S P Tuck; R M Francis; L Treadgold; K Hind
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Combined Measures of Dynamic Bone Quality and Postural Balance--A Fracture Risk Assessment Approach in Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Amit Bhattacharya; Nelson B Watts; Alok Dwivedi; Rakesh Shukla; Ashutosh Mani; Dima Diab
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Differential effects between the loss of MMP-2 and MMP-9 on structural and tissue-level properties of bone.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Conor C Lynch; Daniel S Perrien; Sophie Thiolloy; Elizabeth C O'Quinn; Chetan A Patil; Xiaohong Bi; George M Pharr; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Gregory R Mundy
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Osteoporosis Imaging in the Geriatric Patient.

Authors:  Ursula Heilmeier; Jiwon Youm; Soheyla Torabi; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 7.  Identifying osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  James F Griffith
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-08

8.  Proton Pump Inhibitor Use, H2-Receptor Antagonist Use, and Risk of Incident Clinical Vertebral Fracture in Women.

Authors:  Julie M Paik; Harold N Rosen; Catherine M Gordon; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Spinal deformity index in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  C Di Somma; M Rubino; A Faggiano; L Vuolo; P Contaldi; N Tafuri; N Tafuto; M Andretti; S Savastano; A Colao
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Effects of low-magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimulation in the rat osteopenia model.

Authors:  S Sehmisch; R Galal; L Kolios; M Tezval; C Dullin; S Zimmer; K M Stuermer; E K Stuermer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.