Literature DB >> 21611966

Differential effects between the loss of MMP-2 and MMP-9 on structural and tissue-level properties of bone.

Jeffry S Nyman1, Conor C Lynch, Daniel S Perrien, Sophie Thiolloy, Elizabeth C O'Quinn, Chetan A Patil, Xiaohong Bi, George M Pharr, Anita Mahadevan-Jansen, Gregory R Mundy.   

Abstract

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are capable of processing certain components of bone tissue, including type 1 collagen, a determinant of the biomechanical properties of bone tissue, and they are expressed by osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Therefore, we posit that MMP activity can affect the ability of bone to resist fracture. To explore this possibility, we determined the architectural, compositional, and biomechanical properties of bones from wild-type (WT), Mmp2(-/-) , and Mmp9(-/-) female mice at 16 weeks of age. MMP-2 and MMP-9 have similar substrates but are expressed primarily by osteoblasts and osteoclasts, respectively. Analysis of the trabecular compartment of the tibia metaphysis by micro-computed tomography (µCT) revealed that these MMPs influence trabecular architecture, not volume. Interestingly, the loss of MMP-9 improved the connectivity density of the trabeculae, whereas the loss of MMP-2 reduced this parameter. Similar differential effects in architecture were observed in the L(5) vertebra, but bone volume fraction was lower for both Mmp2(-/-) and Mmp9(-/-) mice than for WT mice. The mineralization density and mineral-to-collagen ratio, as determined by µCT and Raman microspectroscopy, were lower in the Mmp2(-/-) bones than in WT control bones. Whole-bone strength, as determined by three-point bending or compression testing, and tissue-level modulus and hardness, as determined by nanoindentation, were less for Mmp2(-/-) than for WT bones. In contrast, the Mmp9(-/-) femurs were less tough with lower postyield deflection (more brittle) than the WT femurs. Taken together, this information reveals that MMPs play a complex role in maintaining bone integrity, with the cell type that expresses the MMP likely being a contributing factor to how the enzyme affects bone quality.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21611966      PMCID: PMC3312757          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  44 in total

1.  Automated method for subtraction of fluorescence from biological Raman spectra.

Authors:  Chad A Lieber; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 2.  Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and cathepsin K contribute differently to osteoclastic activities.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Delaissé; Thomas L Andersen; Michael T Engsig; Kim Henriksen; Tine Troen; Laurence Blavier
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  The first stage of transforming growth factor beta1 activation is release of the large latent complex from the extracellular matrix of growth plate chondrocytes by matrix vesicle stromelysin-1 (MMP-3).

Authors:  S Maeda; D D Dean; R Gomez; Z Schwartz; B D Boyan
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2001-12-21       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Hierarchical relationship between bone traits and mechanical properties in inbred mice.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Ozan J Akkus; Robert J Majeska; Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Age-related changes in physicochemical properties of mineral crystals are related to impaired mechanical function of cortical bone.

Authors:  Ozan Akkus; Fran Adar; Mitchell B Schaffler
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Altered fracture repair in the absence of MMP9.

Authors:  Céline Colnot; Zachary Thompson; Theodore Miclau; Zena Werb; Jill A Helms
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Association of a polymorphism of the matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene with bone mineral density in Japanese men.

Authors:  Yoshiji Yamada; Fujiko Ando; Naoakira Niino; Hiroshi Shimokata
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.694

8.  Clinical and radiographic findings in two brothers affected with a novel mutation in matrix metalloproteinase 2 gene.

Authors:  Faysal Gok; Lauréane Mittaz Crettol; Yasemin Alanay; Bulent Hacihamdioglu; Murat Kocaoglu; Luisa Bonafe; Seza Ozen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 9.  The toughness of cortical bone and its relationship with age.

Authors:  Xiaodu Wang; Sreekar Puram
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  TGF-beta1-induced migration of bone mesenchymal stem cells couples bone resorption with formation.

Authors:  Yi Tang; Xiangwei Wu; Weiqi Lei; Lijuan Pang; Chao Wan; Zhenqi Shi; Ling Zhao; Timothy R Nagy; Xinyu Peng; Junbo Hu; Xu Feng; Wim Van Hul; Mei Wan; Xu Cao
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  41 in total

1.  Regulation of reactionary dentin formation by odontoblasts in response to polymicrobial invasion of dentin matrix.

Authors:  Nattida Charadram; Ramin M Farahani; Derek Harty; Catherine Rathsam; Michael V Swain; Neil Hunter
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Targeting polymer therapeutics to bone.

Authors:  Stewart A Low; Jindřich Kopeček
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Bmp2 in osteoblasts of periosteum and trabecular bone links bone formation to vascularization and mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Wuchen Yang; Dayong Guo; Marie A Harris; Yong Cui; Jelica Gluhak-Heinrich; Junjie Wu; Xiao-Dong Chen; Charles Skinner; Jeffry S Nyman; James R Edwards; Gregory R Mundy; Alex Lichtler; Barbara E Kream; David W Rowe; Ivo Kalajzic; Val David; Darryl L Quarles; Demetri Villareal; Greg Scott; Manas Ray; S Liu; James F Martin; Yuji Mishina; Stephen E Harris
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Polarization control of Raman spectroscopy optimizes the assessment of bone tissue.

Authors:  Alexander J Makowski; Chetan A Patil; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Applying Full Spectrum Analysis to a Raman Spectroscopic Assessment of Fracture Toughness of Human Cortical Bone.

Authors:  Alexander J Makowski; Mathilde Granke; Oscar D Ayala; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 6.  Contributions of Raman spectroscopy to the understanding of bone strength.

Authors:  Gurjit S Mandair; Michael D Morris
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-01-07

Review 7.  Vibrational spectroscopic techniques to assess bone quality.

Authors:  E P Paschalis; S Gamsjaeger; K Klaushofer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  The tumor microenvironment shapes hallmarks of mature B-cell malignancies.

Authors:  K H Shain; W S Dalton; J Tao
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  The loss of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) reduces bone toughness and fracture toughness.

Authors:  Alexander J Makowski; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Sandra A Wadeer; Jack M Whitehead; Barbara J Rowland; Mathilde Granke; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Xiangli Yang; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Osteoclast-mediated bone resorption is controlled by a compensatory network of secreted and membrane-tethered metalloproteinases.

Authors:  Lingxin Zhu; Yi Tang; Xiao-Yan Li; Evan T Keller; Jingwen Yang; Jung-Sun Cho; Tamar Y Feinberg; Stephen J Weiss
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 17.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.