Literature DB >> 28744620

Persistent perceptual delay for active head movement onset relative to sound onset with and without vision.

William Chung1, Michael Barnett-Cowan2.   

Abstract

Knowing when the head moves is crucial information for the central nervous system to maintain a veridical representation of the self in the world for perception and action. Previous studies have shown that active head movement onset has to precede a sound by approximately 80 ms to be perceived as simultaneous, suggesting that the perceived timing of head movement is slow. However, this research was conducted with closed eyes. Given that visual information is available for most natural head movements, could perceptual delays in head movement onset be related to removing vision? Here, we examined whether visual information affects the perceived timing of active head movement onset. Participants performed a series of temporal order judgment tasks between their active head movement and an auditory tone presented at various stimulus onset asynchronies. Visual information was either absent (eyes closed) or present while either maintaining fixation on an earth or head-fixed target in the dark or in the light. Results show that head movement onset has to precede a sound by ~76 ms with eyes closed confirming previous work. The results also suggest that head movement onset must still precede a sound when fixating targets in the dark with a trend for the head having to move with less lead time with visual information and with the vestibulo-ocular reflex active or suppressed (~70 to 48 ms). Together, these results suggest that the perception of head movement onset is persistently delayed and is not fully resolved even with full field visual input.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory; Head movement; Multisensory; Subjective simultaneity; Temporal order judgment; Time perception; Vestibular; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28744620     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5026-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Direction-of-motion discrimination is facilitated by visible motion smear.

Authors:  Jianliang Tong; Murat Aydin; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-01

Review 2.  Vestibular perception is slow: a review.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.286

3.  Human vestibuloocular reflex and its interactions with vision and fixation distance during linear and angular head movement.

Authors:  G D Paige; L Telford; S H Seidman; G R Barnes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Temporal processing of active and passive head movement.

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Egocentric perception through interaction among many sensory systems.

Authors:  M Ohmi
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-12

6.  Early vestibular processing does not discriminate active from passive self-motion if there is a discrepancy between predicted and actual proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Jessica X Brooks; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Amanda H Turner; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The perception of heading during eye movements.

Authors:  C S Royden; M S Banks; J A Crowell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Visual and vestibular perceptual thresholds each demonstrate better precision at specific frequencies and also exhibit optimal integration.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Koeun Lim; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Martin S Banks; Daniel R Berger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.