A Fileni1, N Magnavita. 1. Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura dell'Anziano (INRCA), Sede di Roma, Via Cassia 1167, I-00189 Roma, Italy. afileni@tiscali.it
Abstract
PURPOSE: Malpractice claims filed against radiologists have become a relevant phenomenon in Italy and are a real risk in the radiologists' professional activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Insurance claims of Italian radiologists over the 1993-2004 period were anonymously assessed. A total of 990 insurance claims were classified according to cause: (1) missed diagnosis, (2) complications of the radiological procedure, (3) failure to order further radiological examinations, (4) radiation treatment, (5) slip-and-fall injuries, (6) miscellaneous causes. RESULTS: A total of 990 claims were filed during the period, with most claims being filed a considerable time after the event. As a consequence, the estimated incidence may be 44 per 1,000. In other words, 44% of Italian radiologists have received, or will receive, a summons regarding their professional activity of the past 10 years. Misdiagnosis made up the first and most important claim category. Missed abnormalities on breast radiographs accounted for the greatest percentage of cases. Missed bone abnormalities were the following most common diagnostic errors. Complications following interventional procedures accounted for 10% of all cases. A few cases resulted from the radiologist's failure to order further diagnostic examinations. Lastly, radiologists were frequently named as one of multiple defendants, together with medical (or surgical) doctors, in cases of patient death in roughly 6% of all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of medical malpractice litigation for Italian radiologists is by now comparable to that for American radiologists. Strict adherence to radiological standards may be a means of reducing the risk of legal action and obviating litigation.
PURPOSE: Malpractice claims filed against radiologists have become a relevant phenomenon in Italy and are a real risk in the radiologists' professional activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Insurance claims of Italian radiologists over the 1993-2004 period were anonymously assessed. A total of 990 insurance claims were classified according to cause: (1) missed diagnosis, (2) complications of the radiological procedure, (3) failure to order further radiological examinations, (4) radiation treatment, (5) slip-and-fall injuries, (6) miscellaneous causes. RESULTS: A total of 990 claims were filed during the period, with most claims being filed a considerable time after the event. As a consequence, the estimated incidence may be 44 per 1,000. In other words, 44% of Italian radiologists have received, or will receive, a summons regarding their professional activity of the past 10 years. Misdiagnosis made up the first and most important claim category. Missed abnormalities on breast radiographs accounted for the greatest percentage of cases. Missed bone abnormalities were the following most common diagnostic errors. Complications following interventional procedures accounted for 10% of all cases. A few cases resulted from the radiologist's failure to order further diagnostic examinations. Lastly, radiologists were frequently named as one of multiple defendants, together with medical (or surgical) doctors, in cases of patientdeath in roughly 6% of all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of medical malpractice litigation for Italian radiologists is by now comparable to that for American radiologists. Strict adherence to radiological standards may be a means of reducing the risk of legal action and obviating litigation.
Authors: M De Filippo; A Corsi; L Evaristi; C Bertoldi; N Sverzellati; R Averna; P Crotti; G Bini; O Tamburrini; M Zompatori; C Rossi Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 3.469