Literature DB >> 23801400

Malpractice claims related to musculoskeletal imaging. Incidence and anatomical location of lesions.

Adriano Fileni1, Gaia Fileni, Paoletta Mirk, Giulia Magnavita, Marzia Nicoli, Nicola Magnavita.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Failure to detect lesions of the musculoskeletal system is a frequent cause of malpractice claims against radiologists.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined all the malpractice claims related to alleged errors in musculoskeletal imaging filed against Italian radiologists over a period of 14 years (1993-2006).
RESULTS: During the period considered, a total of 416 claims for alleged diagnostic errors relating to the musculoskeletal system were filed against radiologists; of these, 389 (93.5%) concerned failure to report fractures, and 15 (3.6%) failure to diagnose a tumour.
CONCLUSIONS: Incorrect interpretation of bone pathology is among the most common causes of litigation against radiologists; alone, it accounts for 36.4% of all malpractice claims filed during the observation period. Awareness of this risk should encourage extreme caution and diligence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23801400     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-013-0953-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  15 in total

1.  Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; Gary R Cutter; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick; Linn A Abraham; Jessica S Fosse; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Medico-legal claims against English radiologists: 1995-2006.

Authors:  S F S Halpin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Malpractice and radiologists in Cook County, IL: trends in 20 years of litigation.

Authors:  L Berlin; J W Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Malpractice and radiologists, update 1986: an 11.5-year perspective.

Authors:  L Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; William M Sage; Catherine M DesRoches; Jordon Peugh; Kinga Zapert; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Malpractice claims following screening mammography in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Vivian van Breest Smallenburg; Wikke Setz-Pels; Johanna H Groenewoud; Adri C Voogd; Frits H Jansen; Marieke W J Louwman; Alexander V Tielbeek; Lucien E M Duijm
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  [An analysis of insurance claims of civil responsibility in radiology. The first Italian data].

Authors:  A Fileni; N Magnavita
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Audit of litigation against the accident and emergency radiology department.

Authors:  S Cantoni; F De Stefano; A Mari; F Savaia; R Rosso; L Derchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 9.  Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.

Authors:  N Houssami; R Given-Wilson; S Ciatto
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.735

10.  Malpractice stress syndrome in radiologists and radiotherapists: perceived causes and consequences.

Authors:  A Fileni; N Magnavita; F Mammi; G Mandoliti; F Lucà; G Magnavita; A Bergamaschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 6.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.