Literature DB >> 21161023

Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology.

Antonio Pinto1, Luca Brunese.   

Abstract

Diagnostic errors are important in all branches of medicine because they are an indication of poor patient care. Since the early 1970s, physicians have been subjected to an increasing number of medical malpractice claims. Radiology is one of the specialties most liable to claims of medical negligence. Most often, a plaintiff's complaint against a radiologist will focus on a failure to diagnose. The etiology of radiological error is multi-factorial. Errors fall into recurrent patterns. Errors arise from poor technique, failures of perception, lack of knowledge and misjudgments. The work of diagnostic radiology consists of the complete detection of all abnormalities in an imaging examination and their accurate diagnosis. Every radiologist should understand the sources of error in diagnostic radiology as well as the elements of negligence that form the basis of malpractice litigation. Error traps need to be uncovered and highlighted, in order to prevent repetition of the same mistakes. This article focuses on the spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology, including a classification of the errors, and stresses the malpractice issues in mammography, chest radiology and obstetric sonography. Missed fractures in emergency and communication issues between radiologists and physicians are also discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic radiology; Medical negligence; Medico-legal problems; Observer performance; Radiological error

Year:  2010        PMID: 21161023      PMCID: PMC2999012          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i10.377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  84 in total

1.  Diagnostic errors in an accident and emergency department.

Authors:  H R Guly
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Responsibilities associated with obstetric sonography.

Authors:  G R Leopold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking.

Authors:  Richard FitzGerald
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Errors of omission.

Authors:  Leonard Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The lateral radiograph for early diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  J V Forrest; S S Sagel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Carcinoma of the lung. A retrospective study with special reference to pre-diagnosis period and roentgenographic signs.

Authors:  E Tala
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1967

Review 7.  Radiology and the law, with an emphasis on interventional radiology.

Authors:  E vanSonnenberg; J B Barton; G R Wittich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Occult orthopaedic trauma in the multiply injured patient.

Authors:  W G Ward; J A Nunley
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project.

Authors:  R S Fontana; D R Sanderson; L B Woolner; W F Taylor; W E Miller; J R Muhm; P E Bernatz; W S Payne; P C Pairolero; E J Bergstralh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Errors in imaging patients in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Alfonso Reginelli; Fabio Pinto; Giuseppe Lo Re; Federico Midiri; Carlo Muzj; Luigia Romano; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Malpractice claims related to musculoskeletal imaging. Incidence and anatomical location of lesions.

Authors:  Adriano Fileni; Gaia Fileni; Paoletta Mirk; Giulia Magnavita; Marzia Nicoli; Nicola Magnavita
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Understanding errors in diagnostic radiology: proposal of a classification scheme and application to emergency radiology.

Authors:  James M Provenzale; Peter G Kranz
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2011-07-24

Review 4.  Errors in multidetector row computed tomography.

Authors:  M A Mazzei; L Volterrani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Risk management in radiology departments.

Authors:  Horea Craciun; Kshitij Mankad; Jeremy Lynch
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-28

6.  Diagnostic errors when interpreting abdominopelvic computed tomography: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Seong Jong Yun; Hyun Cheol Kim; Dal Mo Yang; Sang Won Kim; Sun Jung Rhee; Sung Eun Ahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Staying out of trouble.

Authors:  Philip Levitt
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Growing number of emergency cranial CTs in patients with head injury not justified by their clinical need.

Authors:  Lukas Lambert; Ondrej Foltan; Jan Briza; Alena Lambertova; Pavel Harsa; Rohan Banerjee; Jan Danes
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 9.  Imaging of post-surgical treatment and of related complications in spinal trauma.

Authors:  F Caranci; G Leone; L Ugga; E Cesarano; R Capasso; S Schipani; A Bianco; P Fonio; F Briganti; L Brunese
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-02-06

10.  Analysis of 30 Spinal Angiograms Falsely Reported as Normal in 18 Patients with Subsequently Documented Spinal Vascular Malformations.

Authors:  P Barreras; D Heck; B Greenberg; J-P Wolinsky; C A Pardo; P Gailloud
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.