Literature DB >> 18536873

The legal implications of error in radiology.

L Olivetti1, A Fileni, F De Stefano, A Cazzulani, G Battaglia, L Pescarini.   

Abstract

Evaluation of the legal implications of error in radiology and therefore the assessment of criminal and civil liability in the practice of the profession requires an analysis of how the public perception of the right to health has radically changed. This change has initiated a defensive approach to medicine and radiology that tends to be oriented towards precautionary measures, with a proliferation of often unnecessary imaging studies. In radiology, errors of omission or commission are frequent. A critical appraisal of the different types of error in radiology will help practitioners undertake the essential corrective measures. Through analysis of several cases derived from legal or insurance proceedings brought against radiologists, the most common forms of error are described, and their implications for criminal and civil liability are illustrated, although it is emphasised that the existence of an error does not always translate into the presence of malpractice.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18536873     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-008-0279-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  8 in total

1.  Hindsight bias.

Authors:  L Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; Gary R Cutter; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick; Linn A Abraham; Jessica S Fosse; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Systematic approach to human error in radiology.

Authors:  L Pescarini; I Inches
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  A 12-year follow-up study of malpractice claims against radiologists in Italy.

Authors:  A Fileni; N Magnavita
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Individual error in radiology.

Authors:  E A Franken
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  [Malpractice in breast imaging].

Authors:  L Pescarini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Hindsight bias among physicians weighing the likelihood of diagnoses.

Authors:  H R Arkes; R L Wortmann; P D Saville; A R Harkness
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1981-04

8.  [Risk management in health care systems: the new legislative orientations in medical civil responsibility].

Authors:  A Tomassini; C Signorelli; E Colzani
Journal:  Ann Ig       Date:  2004 Jan-Apr
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Luca Brunese
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28

2.  Clinical Risk Management in radiology. Part I: general background and types of error and their prevention.

Authors:  R Golfieri; L Pescarini; A Fileni; R Silverio; C Saccavini; D Visconti; G Morana; M Centonze
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Medical malpractice: the experience in Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Traina
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Use of contrast media in diagnostic imaging: medico-legal considerations.

Authors:  C Pomara; N Pascale; F Maglietta; M Neri; I Riezzo; E Turillazzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Evaluation of a deep learning-based computer-aided detection algorithm on chest radiographs: Case-control study.

Authors:  Soo Yun Choi; Sunggyun Park; Minchul Kim; Jongchan Park; Ye Ra Choi; Kwang Nam Jin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.