BACKGROUND: Two important limitations of the data regarding the outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) are the short-term follow-up used in most published studies and the lack of single-procedure outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to report the long-term single-procedure outcomes at our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient population was comprised of 200 consecutive patients who underwent ablation (133 men; age 56 +/- 11 years). Atrial fibrillation was paroxysmal in 92 (46%). Success was defined as absence of symptomatic AF, off antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) after a single procedure. RESULTS: After a follow-up of 26 +/- 11 months, the single-procedure long-term success rate was 28% with an additional 7% of patients demonstrating improvement. After including repeat procedures in 64 patients, the overall long-term success rate was 41% with 11% demonstrating improvement. Further subgroup analysis of 48 paroxysmal AF patients considered to be optimal candidates for the procedure, revealed a long-term success rate of 69% with an additional 4% demonstrating improvement. A major complication occurred in 7.9% of patients. CONCLUSION: The results reveal that the long-term single-procedure success rate of catheter ablation of AF in a cohort of patients with predominantly non-paroxysmal AF is less than 40%. The inclusion of redo procedures resulted in an improvement in outcomes. A much higher success rate of 69% was achieved in patients with paroxysmal AF considered to be optimal candidates for this procedure. These results make it clear that further advances in the technique of catheter ablation of AF are needed to improve the safety and efficacy of this procedure. In order to be able to compare outcomes of various techniques in differing patient populations, we urge investigators to report long-term single procedure outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Two important limitations of the data regarding the outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) are the short-term follow-up used in most published studies and the lack of single-procedure outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to report the long-term single-procedure outcomes at our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient population was comprised of 200 consecutive patients who underwent ablation (133 men; age 56 +/- 11 years). Atrial fibrillation was paroxysmal in 92 (46%). Success was defined as absence of symptomatic AF, off antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) after a single procedure. RESULTS: After a follow-up of 26 +/- 11 months, the single-procedure long-term success rate was 28% with an additional 7% of patients demonstrating improvement. After including repeat procedures in 64 patients, the overall long-term success rate was 41% with 11% demonstrating improvement. Further subgroup analysis of 48 paroxysmal AFpatients considered to be optimal candidates for the procedure, revealed a long-term success rate of 69% with an additional 4% demonstrating improvement. A major complication occurred in 7.9% of patients. CONCLUSION: The results reveal that the long-term single-procedure success rate of catheter ablation of AF in a cohort of patients with predominantly non-paroxysmal AF is less than 40%. The inclusion of redo procedures resulted in an improvement in outcomes. A much higher success rate of 69% was achieved in patients with paroxysmal AF considered to be optimal candidates for this procedure. These results make it clear that further advances in the technique of catheter ablation of AF are needed to improve the safety and efficacy of this procedure. In order to be able to compare outcomes of various techniques in differing patient populations, we urge investigators to report long-term single procedure outcomes.
Authors: Hakan Oral; Bradley P Knight; Hiroshi Tada; Mehmet Ozaydin; Aman Chugh; Sohail Hassan; Christoph Scharf; Steve W K Lai; Radmira Greenstein; Frank Pelosi; S Adam Strickberger; Fred Morady Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hakan Oral; Aman Chugh; Christoph Scharf; Burr Hall; Peter Cheung; Srikar Veerareddy; Gerald F Daneshvar; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Maryam Goudarzi; Mark M Ross; Weidong Zhou; Amy Van Meter; Jianghong Deng; Lisa M Martin; Chidima Martin; Lance Liotta; Emanuel Petricoin; Niv Ad Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; David E Krummen; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Paul Clopton; Wouter-Jan Rappel; John M Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ehud J Schmidt; Zion T H Tse; Tobias R Reichlin; Gregory F Michaud; Ronald D Watkins; Kim Butts-Pauly; Raymond Y Kwong; William Stevenson; Jeffrey Schweitzer; Israel Byrd; Charles L Dumoulin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.668