PURPOSE: Voltage-based device-tracking (VDT) systems are commonly used for tracking invasive devices in electrophysiological cardiac-arrhythmia therapy. During electrophysiological procedures, electro-anatomic mapping workstations provide guidance by integrating VDT location and intracardiac electrocardiogram information with X-ray, computerized tomography, ultrasound, and MR images. MR assists navigation, mapping, and radiofrequency ablation. Multimodality interventions require multiple patient transfers between an MRI and the X-ray/ultrasound electrophysiological suite, increasing the likelihood of patient-motion and image misregistration. An MRI-compatible VDT system may increase efficiency, as there is currently no single method to track devices both inside and outside the MRI scanner. METHODS: An MRI-compatible VDT system was constructed by modifying a commercial system. Hardware was added to reduce MRI gradient-ramp and radiofrequency unblanking pulse interference. VDT patches and cables were modified to reduce heating. Five swine cardiac VDT electro-anatomic mapping interventions were performed, navigating inside and thereafter outside the MRI. RESULTS: Three-catheter VDT interventions were performed at >12 frames per second both inside and outside the MRI scanner with <3 mm error. Catheters were followed on VDT- and MRI-derived maps. Simultaneous VDT and imaging was possible in repetition time >32 ms sequences with <0.5 mm errors, and <5% MRI signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) loss. At shorter repetition times, only intracardiac electrocardiogram was reliable. Radiofrequency heating was <1.5°C. CONCLUSION: An MRI-compatible VDT system is feasible.
PURPOSE: Voltage-based device-tracking (VDT) systems are commonly used for tracking invasive devices in electrophysiological cardiac-arrhythmia therapy. During electrophysiological procedures, electro-anatomic mapping workstations provide guidance by integrating VDT location and intracardiac electrocardiogram information with X-ray, computerized tomography, ultrasound, and MR images. MR assists navigation, mapping, and radiofrequency ablation. Multimodality interventions require multiple patient transfers between an MRI and the X-ray/ultrasound electrophysiological suite, increasing the likelihood of patient-motion and image misregistration. An MRI-compatible VDT system may increase efficiency, as there is currently no single method to track devices both inside and outside the MRI scanner. METHODS: An MRI-compatible VDT system was constructed by modifying a commercial system. Hardware was added to reduce MRI gradient-ramp and radiofrequency unblanking pulse interference. VDT patches and cables were modified to reduce heating. Five swine cardiac VDT electro-anatomic mapping interventions were performed, navigating inside and thereafter outside the MRI. RESULTS: Three-catheter VDT interventions were performed at >12 frames per second both inside and outside the MRI scanner with <3 mm error. Catheters were followed on VDT- and MRI-derived maps. Simultaneous VDT and imaging was possible in repetition time >32 ms sequences with <0.5 mm errors, and <5% MRI signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) loss. At shorter repetition times, only intracardiac electrocardiogram was reliable. Radiofrequency heating was <1.5°C. CONCLUSION: An MRI-compatible VDT system is feasible.
Authors: Timm Dickfeld; Ritsushi Kato; Menekem Zviman; Saman Nazarian; Jun Dong; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Albert C Lardo; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry Halperin Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Luis F Gutiérrez; Ranil de Silva; Cengizhan Ozturk; Merdim Sonmez; Annette M Stine; Amish N Raval; Venkatesh K Raman; Vandana Sachdev; Ronnier J Aviles; Myron A Waclawiw; Elliot R McVeigh; Robert J Lederman Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Xiao Kui Li; James Pemberton; Kai Thomenius; Aaron Dentinger; Robert I Lowe; Muhammad Ashraf; K Kirk Shung; Raymond Chia; Douglas N Stephens; Matthew O'Donnell; Aman Mahajan; Seshadri Balaji; Kalyanam Shivkumar; David J Sahn Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Aamir Cheema; Chandrasekhar R Vasamreddy; Darshan Dalal; Joseph E Marine; Jun Dong; Charles A Henrikson; David Spragg; Alan Cheng; Saman Nazarian; Sunil Sinha; Henry Halperin; Ronald Berger; Hugh Calkins Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2006-08-05 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Aamir Cheema; Jun Dong; Darshan Dalal; Chandrasekhar R Vasamreddy; Joseph E Marine; Charles A Henrikson; David Spragg; Alan Cheng; Saman Nazarian; Sunil Sinha; Henry Halperin; Ronald Berger; Hugh Calkins Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2006-10
Authors: Aamir Cheema; Jun Dong; Darshan Dalal; Joseph E Marine; Charles A Henrikson; David Spragg; Alan Cheng; Saman Nazarian; Kenneth Bilchick; Sunil Sinha; Daniel Scherr; Ibrahim Almasry; Henry Halperin; Ronald Berger; Hugh Calkins Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2007-04
Authors: Dana C Peters; John V Wylie; Thomas H Hauser; Kraig V Kissinger; René M Botnar; Vidal Essebag; Mark E Josephson; Warren J Manning Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ehud J Schmidt; Ronald D Watkins; Menekhem M Zviman; Michael A Guttman; Wei Wang; Henry A Halperin Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Ehud J Schmidt; Gregory Olson; Junichi Tokuda; Akbar Alipour; Ronald D Watkins; Eric M Meyer; Hassan Elahi; William G Stevenson; Jeffrey Schweitzer; Charles L Dumoulin; Thomas Johnson; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Wolfgang Loew; Henry R Halperin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 3.737