BACKGROUND: Catheter-based isolation of pulmonary veins has become established treatment for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. We wished to simplify the interventional procedure by using a single novel multipolar catheter for mapping and ablation in appropriate patients. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation were screened by cardiac computed tomography for anatomic suitability to undergo a simplified procedure with the high-density mesh ablator catheter (MESH) as the only left atrial device. The procedure was undertaken in 38 patients matching the criteria of four clearly separated pulmonary veins with ostial diameters 15-25 mm; the remaining 26 patients served as a control group and were treated using a three-dimensional mapping system guided ablation using a circular mapping catheter and a single-point ablation catheter. RESULTS: In all 38 patients, all four pulmonary veins could be accessed and mapped with the MESH. Using the MESH, electrical isolation was achieved in 142/148 (96%) pulmonary veins with recorded potentials. In the control group, 100/105 (95%) pulmonary veins with recorded potentials could be isolated. After 6 months, clinical results did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In appropriate patients, the routine single catheter approach with the MESH for mapping and ablation yields a high acute success rate despite the reduced complexity of the procedure. Long-term data on clinical success rates are needed to justify this simplified approach.
BACKGROUND: Catheter-based isolation of pulmonary veins has become established treatment for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. We wished to simplify the interventional procedure by using a single novel multipolar catheter for mapping and ablation in appropriate patients. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation were screened by cardiac computed tomography for anatomic suitability to undergo a simplified procedure with the high-density mesh ablator catheter (MESH) as the only left atrial device. The procedure was undertaken in 38 patients matching the criteria of four clearly separated pulmonary veins with ostial diameters 15-25 mm; the remaining 26 patients served as a control group and were treated using a three-dimensional mapping system guided ablation using a circular mapping catheter and a single-point ablation catheter. RESULTS: In all 38 patients, all four pulmonary veins could be accessed and mapped with the MESH. Using the MESH, electrical isolation was achieved in 142/148 (96%) pulmonary veins with recorded potentials. In the control group, 100/105 (95%) pulmonary veins with recorded potentials could be isolated. After 6 months, clinical results did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In appropriate patients, the routine single catheter approach with the MESH for mapping and ablation yields a high acute success rate despite the reduced complexity of the procedure. Long-term data on clinical success rates are needed to justify this simplified approach.
Authors: Isabelle C Van Gelder; Vincent E Hagens; Hans A Bosker; J Herre Kingma; Otto Kamp; Tsjerk Kingma; Salah A Said; Julius I Darmanata; Alphons J M Timmermans; Jan G P Tijssen; Harry J G M Crijns Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-12-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yoshihide Takahashi; Mark D O'neill; Anders Jönsson; Prashanthan Sanders; Frédéric Sacher; Mélèze Hocini; Pierre Jaïs; Jacques Clémenty; Michel Haïssaguerre Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2006-02-28 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Peter Salem Spector; Arshia Mehdi Noori; Nicholas Jackson Hardin; James Daniel Calame; Steve Paul Bell; Daniel Lawrence Lustgarten Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Josep Brugada; Douglas L Packer; Riccardo Cappato; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Pierre Jais; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Bruce D Lindsay; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Andrea Natale; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2007-04-30 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Bramah N Singh; Steven N Singh; Domenic J Reda; X Charlene Tang; Becky Lopez; Crystal L Harris; Ross D Fletcher; Satish C Sharma; J Edwin Atwood; Alan K Jacobson; H Daniel Lewis; Dennis W Raisch; Michael D Ezekowitz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Juraj Kunisek; Luka Zaputovic; Marta Zuvic Butorac; Leon Kunisek; Ksenija Lukin-Eskinja; Rade Karlavaris; Irena Bruketa-Markic Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2008 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Daniel Steven; Thomas Rostock; Boris Lutomsky; Hanno Klemm; Helge Servatius; Imke Drewitz; Kai Friedrichs; Rodolfo Ventura; Thomas Meinertz; Stephan Willems Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2008-02-09 Impact factor: 29.983