Literature DB >> 17019032

Dosimetric impact of a CT metal artefact suppression algorithm for proton, electron and photon therapies.

Jikun Wei1, George A Sandison, Wen-Chien Hsi, Michael Ringor, Xiaoyi Lu.   

Abstract

Accurate dose calculation is essential to precision radiation treatment planning and this accuracy depends upon anatomic and tissue electron density information. Modern treatment planning inhomogeneity corrections use x-ray CT images and calibrated scales of tissue CT number to electron density to provide this information. The presence of metal in the volume scanned by an x-ray CT scanner causes metal induced image artefacts that influence CT numbers and thereby introduce errors in the radiation dose distribution calculated. This paper investigates the dosimetric improvement achieved by a previously proposed x-ray CT metal artefact suppression technique when the suppressed images of a patient with bilateral hip prostheses are used in commercial treatment planning systems for proton, electron or photon therapies. For all these beam types, this clinical image and treatment planning study reveals that the target may be severely underdosed if a metal artefact-contaminated image is used for dose calculations instead of the artefact suppressed one. Of the three beam types studied, the metal artefact suppression is most important for proton therapy dose calculations, intermediate for electron therapy and least important for x-ray therapy but still significant. The study of a water phantom having a metal rod simulating a hip prosthesis indicates that CT numbers generated after image processing for metal artefact suppression are accurate and thus dose calculations based on the metal artefact suppressed images will be of high fidelity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17019032     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/20/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Influence of metallic dental implants and metal artefacts on dose calculation accuracy.

Authors:  Manuel Maerz; Oliver Koelbl; Barbara Dobler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Evaluation of a commercial orthopaedic metal artefact reduction tool in radiation therapy of patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  H Kwon; K S Kim; Y M Chun; H-G Wu; J N K Carlson; J M Park; J-I Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; James R Kerns; Jessica L Nute; Xinming Liu; Peter A Balter; Francesco C Stingo; David S Followill; Dragan Mirkovic; Rebecca M Howell; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Chordomas of the skull base and cervical spine: clinical outcomes associated with a multimodal surgical resection combined with proton-beam radiation in 40 patients.

Authors:  Muneyoshi Yasuda; Damien Bresson; Salvatore Chibbaro; Jan F Cornelius; Marc Polivka; Loic Feuvret; Masakazu Takayasu; Bernard George
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Improved accuracy of relative electron density and proton stopping power ratio through CycleGAN machine learning.

Authors:  Jessica Scholey; Luciano Vinas; Vasant Kearney; Sue Yom; Peder Eric Zufall Larson; Martina Descovich; Atchar Sudhyadhom
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.174

6.  The effects of the orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) algorithm on contouring and dosimetry of head and neck radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  Jussi Sillanpaa; Michael Lovelock; Boris Mueller
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.482

7.  Can megavoltage computed tomography reduce proton range uncertainties in treatment plans for patients with large metal implants?

Authors:  Wayne D Newhauser; Annelise Giebeler; Katja M Langen; Dragan Mirkovic; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Tissue Expanders and Proton Beam Radiotherapy: What You Need to Know.

Authors:  Ashley L Howarth; Joshua R Niska; Kenneth Brooks; Aman Anand; Martin Bues; Carlos E Vargas; Raman C Mahabir
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-06-23

9.  Dose perturbation effect of metallic spinal implants in proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Yingcui Jia; Li Zhao; Chee-Wai Cheng; Mark W McDonald; Indra J Das
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Dosimetric impact of using a commercial metal artifact reduction tool in carbon ion therapy in patients with hip prostheses.

Authors:  Jingfang Zhao; Weiwei Wang; Kambiz Shahnaz; Xianwei Wu; Jingfang Mao; Ping Li; Qing Zhang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.