Literature DB >> 12439893

Does the current consent process minimize the risks of genetics research?

Dave Wendler1, Kiran Prasad, Benjamin Wilfond.   

Abstract

Completion of the human genome project is expected to lead to an increase in the number of individuals who participate in genetics research. The current informed consent process-developed prior to widespread genetics research-may not be sufficient to minimize the research risks that these individuals face. The current consent process focuses on informing individuals of the risks of research participation prior to their research enrollment. However, the risks of genetics research often are influenced by what subjects disclose to others after their research participation has ended. To assess whether the current consent process helps subjects remember the risks of future disclosures and, thereby, minimize the risks of genetics research, we interviewed 130 individuals who had previously participated in genetics research. Nineteen percent recalled that their samples would undergo genetic testing; 16% recalled that samples might be used for future research; 15% recalled that release of research records could affect their insurance status. These data suggest that current consent practices may not minimize the risks of genetics research. To address this concern, Institutional Review Boards and investigators should consider implementing supplemental mechanisms to help subjects remember when forgetting aspects of their research participation could place them at increased risk. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12439893     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.10818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  5 in total

1.  Voluntary participation and informed consent to international genetic research.

Authors:  Patricia A Marshall; Clement A Adebamowo; Adebowale A Adeyemo; Temidayo O Ogundiran; Mirjana Vekich; Teri Strenski; Jie Zhou; T Elaine Prewitt; Richard S Cooper; Charles N Rotimi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.

Authors:  Ebony B Bookman; Aleisha A Langehorne; John H Eckfeldt; Kathleen C Glass; Gail P Jarvik; Michael Klag; Greg Koski; Arno Motulsky; Benjamin Wilfond; Teri A Manolio; Richard R Fabsitz; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Recruitment of families for genetic studies of epilepsy.

Authors:  Ruth Ottman; Karina Berenson; Christie Barker-Cummings
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  A randomized controlled trial of short and standard-length consent forms for a genetic cohort study: is longer better?

Authors:  Kenji Matsui; Reidar K Lie; Tanvir C Turin; Yoshikuni Kita
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.211

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.