Literature DB >> 17015338

Are apes really inequity averse?

Juliane Bräuer1, Josep Call, Michael Tomasello.   

Abstract

Brosnan et al. (Brosnan, S. F. Schiff, H. C. & de Waal, F. B. M. 2005 Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proc. R. Soc. B272, 253-258) found that chimpanzees showed increased levels of rejection for less-preferred food when competitors received better food than themselves and postulated as an explanation inequity aversion. In the present study, we extended these findings by adding important control conditions, and we investigated whether inequity aversion could also be found in the other great ape species and whether it would be influenced by subjects' relationship with the competitor. In the present study, subjects showed a pattern of food rejection opposite to the subjects of the above study by Brosnan et al. (2005). Our apes ignored fewer food pieces and stayed longer in front of the experimenter when a conspecific received better food than themselves. Moreover, chimpanzees begged more vigorously when the conspecific got favoured food. The most plausible explanation for these results is the food expectation hypothesis - seeing another individual receive high-quality food creates the expectation of receiving the same food oneself - and not inequity aversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17015338      PMCID: PMC1679898          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Alan G Sanfey; James K Rilling; Jessica A Aronson; Leigh E Nystrom; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Animal behaviour: inequity aversion in capuchins?

Authors:  Joseph Henrich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Animal behaviour: fair refusal by capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse?

Authors:  Diane Dubreuil; Maria Silvia Gentile; Elisabetta Visalberghi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  What's in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Keith Jensen; Brian Hare; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Partial support from a non-replication: comment on Roma, Silberberg, Ruggiero, and Suomi (2006).

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect.

Authors:  Peter G Roma; Alan Silberberg; Angela M Ruggiero; Stephen J Suomi
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Précis ofFrustration Theory: An Analysis of Dispositional Learning and Memory.

Authors:  A Amsel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-09

10.  Monkeys reject unequal pay.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M De Waal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  32 in total

1.  Human children but not chimpanzees make irrational decisions driven by social comparison.

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Lou M Haux; Henriette Zeidler; Jan M Engelmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Marmoset monkeys evaluate third-party reciprocity.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kawai; Miyuki Yasue; Taku Banno; Noritaka Ichinohe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Extent and limits of cooperation in animals.

Authors:  Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Squirrel monkeys' response to inequitable outcomes indicates a behavioural convergence within the primates.

Authors:  Catherine F Talbot; Hani D Freeman; Lawrence E Williams; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Colloquium paper: the difference of being human: morality.

Authors:  Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Catherine Talbot; Megan Ahlgren; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task.

Authors:  Jan M Engelmann; Jeremy B Clift; Esther Herrmann; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Theft in an ultimatum game: chimpanzees and bonobos are insensitive to unfairness.

Authors:  Ingrid Kaiser; Keith Jensen; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Defining reward value by cross-modal scaling.

Authors:  Anna H Casey; Alan Silberberg; Annika Paukner; Stephen J Suomi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort.

Authors:  Megan van Wolkenten; Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.