Literature DB >> 18000045

Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort.

Megan van Wolkenten1, Sarah F Brosnan, Frans B M de Waal.   

Abstract

Without joint benefits, joint actions could never have evolved. Cooperative animals need to monitor closely how large a share they receive relative to their investment toward collective goals. This work documents the sensitivity to reward division in brown, or tufted, capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). In addition to confirming previous results with a larger subject pool, this work rules out several alternative explanations and adds data on effort sensitivity. Thirteen adult monkeys exchanged tokens for rewards, showing negative reactions to receiving a less-favored reward than their partner. Because their negative reaction could not be attributed to the mere visibility of better rewards (greed hypothesis) nor to having received such rewards in the immediate past (frustration hypothesis), it must have been caused by seeing their partner obtain the better reward. Effort had a major effect in that by far the lowest level of performance in the entire study occurred in subjects required to expend a large effort while at the same time seeing their partner receive a better reward. It is unclear whether this effort-effect was based on comparisons with the partner, but it added significantly to the intensity of the inequity response. These effects are as expected if the inequity response evolved in the context of cooperative survival strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18000045      PMCID: PMC2141866          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707182104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Animal behaviour: inequity aversion in capuchins?

Authors:  Joseph Henrich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Animal behaviour: fair refusal by capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Are capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) inequity averse?

Authors:  Diane Dubreuil; Maria Silvia Gentile; Elisabetta Visalberghi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Are apes really inequity averse?

Authors:  Juliane Bräuer; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Partial support from a non-replication: comment on Roma, Silberberg, Ruggiero, and Suomi (2006).

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Capuchin monkeys, inequity aversion, and the frustration effect.

Authors:  Peter G Roma; Alan Silberberg; Angela M Ruggiero; Stephen J Suomi
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: allocators versus recipients.

Authors:  K A Diekmann; S M Samuels; L Ross; M H Bazerman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1997-05

8.  Socially learned preferences for differentially rewarded tokens in the brown capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Monkeys reject unequal pay.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Frans B M De Waal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Egalitarian motives in humans.

Authors:  Christopher T Dawes; James H Fowler; Tim Johnson; Richard McElreath; Oleg Smirnov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  32 in total

1.  Squirrel monkeys' response to inequitable outcomes indicates a behavioural convergence within the primates.

Authors:  Catherine F Talbot; Hani D Freeman; Lawrence E Williams; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Prosocial primates: selfish and unselfish motivations.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal; Malini Suchak
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Catherine Talbot; Megan Ahlgren; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Reciprocal cooperation between unrelated rats depends on cost to donor and benefit to recipient.

Authors:  Karin Schneeberger; Melanie Dietz; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Helping behaviour and regard for others in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Jennifer L Barnes; Tyler Hill; Melanie Langer; Margaret Martinez; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Chimpanzees play the ultimatum game.

Authors:  Darby Proctor; Rebecca A Williamson; Frans B M de Waal; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Defining reward value by cross-modal scaling.

Authors:  Anna H Casey; Alan Silberberg; Annika Paukner; Stephen J Suomi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Lisa Horn; Zsófia Viranyi; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Monkeys benefit from reciprocity without the cognitive burden.

Authors:  Malini Suchak; Frans B M de Waal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.