Literature DB >> 33459860

Long-term MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy results of 600 single-center procedures.

J Lambert1,2, T Steelandt3, S H Heywang-Köbrunner4, K Gieraerts1, I Van Den Berghe5, Ch Van Ongeval2, J W Casselman6,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to report on the performance of the MRI-guided VABB in our center and to look at the long-term outcome of biopsies with benign histology over a period of 19 years.
METHODS: In a single-center retrospective review study, data of 600 VABB procedures performed between September 1999 and March 2017 were evaluated. We collected patient demographics, histopathological diagnosis at MRI-VABB, and basic lesion characteristics (size, location). Data from the Belgian Cancer Registry was cross-referenced with our database to find out which patients with benign MRI-VABB results developed a malignant lesion over time.
RESULTS: These 600 VABB procedures were performed in 558 women with a mean patient age of 51.8 years (range 18-82 years). Our technical success rate was 99.3%. We found 27.67% B5 lesions, 9.82% B3 lesions, and 0.17% B4 lesions. Of 362 benign MRI-guided VABBs, follow-up data was available for a mean follow-up period of 7.6 years (0.8-18.3). Only one (0.3%) biopsy was a false negative lesion after MRI-guided VABB during follow-up. Short-term FU-MRI provided no increase in detection rate.
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of MRI-guided VABB is high with a very low false negative rate of 0.3% on long-term follow-up. The value of short-term FU-MRI for every case after MRI-guided VABB may be questioned. KEY POINTS: • MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsies yield a large portion of clinically relevant lesions (9.82% B3, 0.17% B4, and 27.67% B5 lesions). • The false negative biopsy rate of MRI-guided VABB in this study with a mean follow-up time of 7.6 years was only 0.3%. • Performing a short-term follow-up MRI after a benign MRI-guided VABB concordant to the MRI appearance may be questioned.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Breast carcinoma; Image-guided biopsy; MR-guided interventional procedures; Magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2021        PMID: 33459860     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07392-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

1.  Vacuum-assisted biopsies under MR guidance: results of 72 procedures.

Authors:  C Malhaire; C El Khoury; F Thibault; A Athanasiou; P Petrow; L Ollivier; A Tardivon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Imaging-Concordant Benign MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy May Not Warrant MRI Follow-Up.

Authors:  Monica L Huang; Megan Speer; Basak E Dogan; Gaiane M Rauch; Rosalind P Candelaria; Beatriz E Adrada; Kenneth R Hess; Wei T Yang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Follow-up outcomes after benign concordant MRI-guided breast biopsy.

Authors:  Jessica H Hayward; Kimberly M Ray; Dorota J Wisner; Bonnie N Joe
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 4.  Do benign-concordant breast MRI biopsy results require short interval follow-up imaging? Report of longitudinal study and review of the literature.

Authors:  David M Pinkney; Sona A Chikarmane; Catherine S Giess
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 1.605

5.  Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions.

Authors:  Claudia Perlet; Sylvia H Heywang-Kobrunner; Anke Heinig; Harald Sittek; Jan Casselman; Ingvar Anderson; Patrick Taourel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Short interval follow-up after a benign concordant MR-guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy--is it worthwhile?

Authors:  Sara D Shaylor; Samantha L Heller; Amy N Melsaether; Dipti Gupta; Avani Gupta; James Babb; Linda Moy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures.

Authors:  Matthew Wallis; Anne Tardivon; Anne Tarvidon; Thomas Helbich; Ingrid Schreer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.034

8.  MR-guided breast biopsy at 3T: diagnostic yield of large core needle biopsy compared with vacuum-assisted biopsy.

Authors:  Carla Meeuwis; Jeroen Veltman; Hester N van Hall; Roel D M Mus; Carla Boetes; Jelle O Barentsz; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of MRI-only lesions: a single center experience.

Authors:  Claudio Spick; Melanie Schernthaner; Katja Pinker; Panagiotis Kapetas; Maria Bernathova; Stephan H Polanec; Hubert Bickel; Georg J Wengert; Margaretha Rudas; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison with stereotactically guided and ultrasound-guided techniques.

Authors:  Thomas Imschweiler; Harald Haueisen; Gert Kampmann; Luzi Rageth; Burkhardt Seifert; Christoph Rageth; Bianka Freiwald; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.